http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8383
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9034
--- Comment #2 from js.m...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 03:25:25 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
A minimal test case to go with those errors would be helpful.
Use a rather bare bones d example and trying to compile for x64 in windows by
adding the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #24 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 03:57:58 PST ---
(In reply to comment #22)
I'm not sold on the term isManifestConstant, I'm sure no non-compiler
developer would have ever heard that term before. I've never seen it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #25 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 04:06:02 PST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
This highlights another conflict in terminology, currently a property is NOT
recognised as a function (at least in my crappy tests). I really
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9082
Summary: join should accept types which are not ranges as the
separator
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #26 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-27
04:14:28 PST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
What the compiler calls stuff internally has no bearing on
what users of the language will call things.
It's not an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #27 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-27
04:15:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #26)
Anyway it's documented behavior, see manifest constants here (it's at the
bottom): http://dlang.org/enum.html
Actually
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #29 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 04:51:33 PST ---
(In reply to comment #26)
(In reply to comment #24)
What the compiler calls stuff internally has no bearing on
what users of the language will call things.
It's
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #30 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 04:53:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #28)
(In reply to comment #26)
It's a shame we don't have a 'manifest' keyword of some sort, it would help
avoid confusion. I guess 'enum' was
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #31 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 05:37:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #20)
https://gist.github.com/4152297
I am seeing a few error cases:
enum j { k = 10 }
pragma(msg, isFunction!(j.k));
pragma(msg,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #32 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-27
06:25:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #29)
As a side point, what do you call X in: enum E { X = 10 } ?
Consider:
enum E { X = 10 }
enum Y = 10;
E.X and Y are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #33 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 06:43:36 PST ---
(In reply to comment #32)
(In reply to comment #29)
As a side point, what do you call X in: enum E { X = 10 } ?
Consider:
enum E { X = 10 }
enum Y = 10;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #34 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 06:45:04 PST ---
@Kenji:
I'm getting an error when using your new isFunction, here's the case:
struct S
{
static string func(alias Class)()
{
foreach(m;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #35 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 06:54:34 PST ---
I've just this afternoon encountered another one that I can't work out a nice
way to discover:
struct S
{
static int x;
}
bool b = isStatic!(S.x); // - I can't think
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9083
Summary: mixin expression on template argument doesn't work
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #37 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 07:19:03 PST
---
(In reply to comment #31)
(In reply to comment #20)
https://gist.github.com/4152297
I am seeing a few error cases:
enum j { k = 10 }
pragma(msg,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9083
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #38 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2012-11-27 07:35:19 PST ---
(In reply to comment #36)
Trying to take the address should do the trick.
is(typeof(S.x)) that is.
That won't work for methods, but that might not be the use case.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #39 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 07:52:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #36)
Trying to take the address should do the trick.
is(typeof(S.x)) that is.
And if I have:
S s;
bool b = isStatic!(s.x);
That solution
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #40 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 07:59:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #38)
That won't work for methods, but that might not be the use case.
Yeah, if it were in std.traits, I would expect it to work on methods too.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #41 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 09:26:36 PST ---
(In reply to comment #37)
This is a compiler bug, not an issue of isFunction template.
I filed new bug 9083.
I found another one, probably a compiler bug too, but I'll
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8383
--- Comment #2 from David Nadlinger c...@klickverbot.at 2012-11-27 09:30:06
PST ---
Hm, strange, I was sure I could repro this using both DMD and LDC at some point
(and yes, building with -m64). In any case, thanks for taking the time to look
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062
David Nadlinger c...@klickverbot.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9084
Summary: Structs assignment and associative arrays
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9085
Summary: allow for iteration of const(V[K]) without casts
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9082
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|join should accept types|Add
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8802
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-27
16:26:32 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1330
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
--- Comment #2 from siegelords_ab...@yahoo.com 2012-11-27 16:27:03 PST ---
I am unhappy how this change breaks existing code without warning. The
progression suggested by Walter should have been followed:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8802
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-11-27 16:52:25 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I'm not sure if this is filed yet.
I think that's already in Bugzilla (not filed by me).
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4596
--- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-27
17:15:02 PST ---
Note: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9079#c2
And Walter's comment: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=780#c3
I'm not sure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4596
--- Comment #7 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-27
17:16:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Unfortunately this is what happens when development procedures are written in
comments instead of a more visible place..
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9086
Summary: std.typecons.appendIfNotNull() or a better idea
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9087
Summary: Value modified in foreach warning
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9088
Summary: static static
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9089
Summary: Very restrictive Tuple constructor
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: enhancement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9087
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 19:31:53 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Currently (DMD 2.061alpha) this code generates a warning:
// program#1
void main() {
foreach (i; 0 .. 10)
i++;
}
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9087
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-11-27 19:49:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This means that the warning is not for the purpose you hope.
I see, thank you for the answer Hara.
But I think the warning I am asking here is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9087
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-27 20:23:02 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
But I think the warning I am asking here is one of the better solutions to
avoid those bugs.
Yes, in many case those *bugs* will be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5168
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8802
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
Rob T al...@ucora.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||al...@ucora.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9090
Summary: auto ref doesn't work with arrays
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
44 matches
Mail list logo
