[Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7900 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9092] GC.extend allocates less then it reports

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9092 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9099] New: segfault while returning an atomicLoad value

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9099 Summary: segfault while returning an atomicLoad value Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2

[Issue 9093] Overloads in extern(C++) interfaces throw up COMDAT errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9093 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Issue 9092] GC.extend allocates less then it reports

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9092 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 8847] voldemort + inout confuses is

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 --- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-11-30 02:35:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) Any news? I wanted to add that https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/982 Is also subject to this issue. -- Configure

[Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9029 --- Comment #10 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-11-30 04:00:37 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) There was a proposal recently on the NG suggesting

[Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6949 --- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-11-30 04:17:15 PST --- Regarding a comment by Don, is it possible to generate a warning/error only in foo() and not in bar()? void foo(uint x) { if (x 0) {} // error or warning here } void

[Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6949 --- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-11-30 05:25:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) (In reply to comment #12) Regarding a comment by Don, is it possible to generate a warning/error only in foo() and not in bar()?

[Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6949 --- Comment #15 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-11-30 06:31:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) (In reply to comment #12) Regarding a comment by Don, is it possible to generate a warning/error only in

[Issue 9099] segfault while returning an atomicLoad value

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9099 --- Comment #1 from Puneet Goel pun...@coverify.org 2012-11-30 06:48:25 PST --- This is related. The result printed out by the code on my Ubuntu amd64 machine is 42 4294967296 Upto version dmd-2.059, it correctly prints 42 and 42. When the

[Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9029 --- Comment #11 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2012-11-30 06:59:54 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) The comments you guys have made indicated to me that you don't realize that the reason this isn't part of the language is simply because

[Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6949 --- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-11-30 09:36:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #15) BTW std.bigint has a lot of examples of valid comparisons of unsigned 0 . The comparisons in std.bigint are like this, all of them are inside

[Issue 7440] ctRegex does not work when using alternatives ('|') involving a '+' inside non-capturing group ('(?:…)')

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7440 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-11-30 12:33:39 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Not a Phobos bug. It's in CTFE side of things. Nowadays it triggers assert. Judging by the assert firing off it's a likely

[Issue 8349] CTFE memcpy Error with ctRegex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8349 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-11-30 12:45:28 PST --- A separate pull for std.regex only: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/984 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7810] [CTFE] Typesafe variadic function with array of structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7810 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 9091] Using __traits(getMember) on template argument fails inside member function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9091 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 9100] Weird behavior on template instance argument

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9100 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||8972, 8971 ---

[Issue 8847] voldemort + inout confuses is

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8847] voldemort + inout confuses is

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-30 23:46:35 PST --- This is a serious problem about the name mangling rule for Voldemort Type. At least there is two rules. 1. Mangled name of a function symbol contains the mangled