[Issue 9186] Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9186 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 00:30:27 PST --- This is not a type system problem. All manifest constants, which declared by `enum` and T.init, make literal expressions in the places where they used. alias T =

[Issue 9186] Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9186 Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 9186] Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9186 --- Comment #5 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 01:52:11 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) This is not a type system problem. All manifest constants, which declared by `enum` and T.init, make literal expressions in the places where

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 06:37:34 PST --- @bear: Please see the comments here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1017 The feature can be implemented but to!() was rejected,

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 9192] New: Allow opEquals for .tupleof expressions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9192 Summary: Allow opEquals for .tupleof expressions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 07:08:12 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) Well, that's why we have std.ascii, no? For all char operations when we don't care about unicode. In all fairness, unicode

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 07:26:08 PST --- Ok I think there are two enhancements here, one for the simple ascii int-char, char-int, and the other more complicated Unicode implementation which

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #8 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 07:32:31 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) It would be nice to have a separate issue filed for tracking Unicode support progress. It can maybe include things like issue

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #9 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 07:34:14 PST --- Ok I think there are two enhancements here, one for the simple ascii int-char, char-int, and the other more complicated Unicode implementation which monarch/dmitry know

[Issue 9012] writef/format inconsistent with format specifier

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9012 --- Comment #4 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-12-21 07:38:30 PST --- The pull has been merged; I just tested the code and it's working now. Should this bug be closed? -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 4463] double.init in associative array seems 0.0

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4463 --- Comment #1 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-12-21 07:45:21 PST --- Seems to be related to bug 3825. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #10 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 07:53:36 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) I'm wrapping up a revamp of std.uni that makes it piece of cake to create character sets. And maps are converted to multi-staged tables that

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #11 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 08:00:56 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #5) I'm wrapping up a revamp of std.uni that makes it piece of cake to create character sets. And

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #12 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 08:04:19 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) int numericValue(dchar c) @safe pure nothrow What about int-dchar? We could call it toNumericChar or something, but it

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #13 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 08:08:20 PST --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #9) int numericValue(dchar c) @safe pure nothrow What about int-dchar? We could call it toNumericChar or something,

[Issue 4183] @property doesnt work with delegate return type

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4183 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #14 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 08:11:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) Aye, and given there are things like 1e12 I don't think packing it would work any better... some kind of custom type is required. Really?

[Issue 3714] Identity assignment operator overload LEGAL for const, shared, etc.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3714 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3715] std.string.format can't use const/immutable toString functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3715 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3810] overloading on const does not work for template methods

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3810 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #15 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-12-21 09:54:26 PST --- Having functions in std.ascii (and elsewhere) seems acceptable. But I think the name of such functions shouldn't be too much long. to!int raises exceptions. Returning -1

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #16 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 10:10:37 PST --- (In reply to comment #15) Having functions in std.ascii (and elsewhere) seems acceptable. But I think the name of such functions shouldn't be too

[Issue 3561] math.abs signature accepts static arrays, but errors internally.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3561 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic |

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #17 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 10:20:15 PST --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #11) Aye, and given there are things like 1e12 I don't think packing it would work any better...

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #18 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-12-21 10:24:12 PST --- (In reply to comment #16) Whereas if it threw to begin with you're forced to catch exceptions. There is no perfect solution. Exceptions are safer than error codes

[Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #19 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 10:53:11 PST --- (In reply to comment #17) (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #11) Aye, and given there are things like 1e12 I don't think packing it would work

[Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #20 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 10:55:24 PST --- (In reply to comment #18) (In reply to comment #16) Whereas if it threw to begin with you're forced to catch exceptions. There is no perfect solution. Exceptions

[Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258 --- Comment #7 from Diggory diggory.ha...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 11:19:38 PST --- Andrej, that seems like a funny change to me. Unless D2 either allows virtual package functions or states that these are not allowed it seems that it's still

[Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258 --- Comment #9 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 15:09:12 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) Yeah I know, the spec tells one thing on one page, then another thing on another. It says Package extends private on the

[Issue 3438] struct ctor with defaulted parameters should be rejected

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3438 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code

[Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258 --- Comment #10 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 17:04:28 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) Non-virtual by default + a virtual keyword + no limits on virtuality based on access specifiers = dream come true (for me).

[Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258 --- Comment #11 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-12-21 17:14:10 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) I forgot one thing that completes the circle, and that is friend declarations. There are no friend declarations in D. So what exactly

[Issue 4006] dirEntries won't span subdirectories

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4006 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 8967] dirEntries throws when encountering a long path on windows

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8967 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8298] dirEntries special linux file in Home dir

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8298 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8291] dirEntry cannot handle root directories + unhandled exception causes crash

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8291 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8250] dirEntries fails to generate file list when compiled with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8250 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|