[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #29 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-27 00:18:28 PST --- Commit pushed to staging at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #30 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-27 00:21:19 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #31 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-12-27 00:24:27 PST --- I did find a long time bug in the way closures are nested. This was not a regression. The non-thread test cases here are now fixed, but I don't know about

[Issue 9216] New: Local import of std.array does not make popFront() visible

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9216 Summary: Local import of std.array does not make popFront() visible Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 9216] Local import of std.array does not make popFront() visible

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9216 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 9217] New: A problem with default function argument initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9217 Summary: A problem with default function argument initialization Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9210 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-27 01:20:52 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9210 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1528] [tdpl] overloading template and non-template functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1528 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #9

[Issue 9213] [2.061 beta] Member access without this and __traits(compiles, ...)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9213 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-27 01:45:16 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 9213] [2.061 beta] Member access without this and __traits(compiles, ...)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9213 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1829] Inline assembler cannot get label addresses

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1829 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.026 |D1 D2

[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #32 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-12-27 03:25:57 PST --- (In reply to comment #26) […] It's not exactly an iterable or sequence, it's a lazy computation represented as a range. The key point is that it doesn't

[Issue 9215] [2.061 beta] isDymanicArray/DynamicArrayTypeOf broken for classes/interfaces with AliasThis

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9215 David Nadlinger c...@klickverbot.at changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #33 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 03:37:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #31) I did find a long time bug in the way closures are nested. This was not a regression. Terrific, thanks! The non-thread test

[Issue 8505] Threadgroups fails using DMD 2.060

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8505 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #34 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 03:52:06 PST --- *** Issue 8505 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Issue 9099] core.atomic.atomicLoad() cannot handle non-POD structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9099 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 9215] [2.061 beta] isDymanicArray/DynamicArrayTypeOf broken for classes/interfaces with AliasThis

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9215 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9071 --- Comment #6 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 06:00:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) This is actually a problem with hasSlicing: It is currently being tightened so that the result of a slice operation *must* be convertible back to

[Issue 8514] dmd generate bug that segfault in very weird situation.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8514 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8854] incomprehensible bug on windows with import side effect

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8854 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9214] TickDuration.to should probably be a property

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9214 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-27 08:01:24 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #35 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-12-27 08:02:56 PST --- (In reply to comment #31) I did find a long time bug in the way closures are nested. This was not a regression. The non-thread test cases here are now fixed,

[Issue 1350] delegate literal inside tuple; wrong values

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1350 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5064] runtime crash using closure as alias parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5064 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #36 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-12-27 08:11:22 PST --- (In reply to comment #31) I did find a long time bug in the way closures are nested. This was not a regression. The non-thread test cases here are now fixed,

[Issue 9211] regex lookahead, (?=(\d\d\d)+\b) failed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 --- Comment #37 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-12-27 08:15:55 PST --- (In reply to comment #31) It's likely that this was causing problems in other bugzilla issues. Others (fixed by these commits) issues are: issue 8514, issue

[Issue 7122] [module] compiler fails to handle import of renamed module

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7122 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9216] Local import of std.array does not make popFront() visible

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9216 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9217] A problem with default function argument initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9217 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7019] implicit constructors are inconsistently allowed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7019 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6185] UFCS doesn't work with function imports

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 9201] WNDPROC does not have to be nothrow

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9201 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9180] can't compile example code on dlang.org

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9180 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 7685] Cannot initialize const field if field initializer present

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7685 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9218] New: [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9218 Summary: [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 2273] Whitespace is not inserted after commas

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 9219] Allow matching { } in asm statements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9219 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9219] New: Allow matching { } in asm statements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9219 Summary: Allow matching { } in asm statements Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 9211] regex lookahead, (?=(\d\d\d)+\b) failed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull ---

[Issue 9180] can't compile example code on dlang.org

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9180 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-27 12:17:07 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org

[Issue 6614] std.traits should have an isFinal template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6614 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 12:59:59 PST --- So is the idea of the enhancement just to merge the two traits under a single name via Phobos templates? E.g. (using overloads): import std.traits;

[Issue 8041] __gshared/static problem

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8041 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9071 --- Comment #7 from Robert Schadek rburn...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 14:04:53 PST --- That sounds very good. Thank you! p.s. Can you point me to the new slicing definition? Anyway thanks again -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 9220] New: module constructor breaks implicit linking with DLL

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9220 Summary: module constructor breaks implicit linking with DLL Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6354] Optimizer bug on x86_64: Bitshift optimized out when foreach and scope(failure) are used

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6354 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-27 14:58:21 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9218 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 9180] can't compile example code on dlang.org

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9180 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6754] extern() in a function signature

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6754 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 16:15:04 PST --- Someone mentioned in IRC they've already implemented this. To the person that did: please provide a patch (or a pull) so we don't duplicate our efforts,

[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9221] New: Added -di flag to make use of deprecated symbols a warning

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9221 Summary: Added -di flag to make use of deprecated symbols a warning Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 9222] New: Add User Defined Attributes (UDA)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9222 Summary: Add User Defined Attributes (UDA) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 9222] Add User Defined Attributes (UDA)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9222 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9223] New: Add -de and -dw switches

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9223 Summary: Add -de and -dw switches Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 9221] Added -di flag to make use of deprecated symbols a warning

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9221 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9223] Add -de and -dw switches

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9223 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9224] New: Add Win64 code generation support for use with Visual C

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 Summary: Add Win64 code generation support for use with Visual C Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 9224] Add Win64 code generation support for use with Visual C

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9225] New: Add sections [Environment32] and [Environment64] to sc.ini/dmd.conf

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9225 Summary: Add sections [Environment32] and [Environment64] to sc.ini/dmd.conf Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 9225] Add sections [Environment32] and [Environment64] to sc.ini/dmd.conf

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9225 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9226] New: More simd instructions allowed as intrinsics

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9226 Summary: More simd instructions allowed as intrinsics Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 9226] More simd instructions allowed as intrinsics

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9226 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9227] __traits(identifier, ...) to pick out identifier from parameter list tuple

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9227 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9227] New: __traits(identifier, ...) to pick out identifier from parameter list tuple

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9227 Summary: __traits(identifier,...) to pick out identifier from parameter list tuple Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 9228] New: Add getProtection to __traits()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9228 Summary: Add getProtection to __traits() Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 9228] Add getProtection to __traits()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9228 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4528] Better error message for private abstract method

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4528 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 1840] Fix ambiguity errors over struct static opCall and regular opCall

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1840 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8787] Virtual not abstract methods in interfaces error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8787 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 8193] wrong error message on escaping initialized immutable instance field

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8193 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 --- Comment #21 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 17:23:46 PST --- *** Issue 8193 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 6707] Error message for mismatch of const/non-const property functions needs to improve

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1730 --- Comment #9 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 17:43:17 PST --- *** Issue 6707 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1730 --- Comment #10 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 17:50:19 PST --- *** Issue 6981 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 6981] incorrect error message when calling method without parentheses

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6981 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6553] Better const(char[]) !- string error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6553 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5905] Error message with const fixed-size array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5905 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic

[Issue 6559] Compiler message expression formatting does not match phobos

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6559 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4947] Not easy to understand error message with pure and const

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4947 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6915] pure after template constraint too

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6915 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4663] Wrong 'static' position error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4663 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4946] Not good error message with wrongly positioned 'const'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4946 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 18:05:06 PST --- *** Issue 6915 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Issue 4540] Better error message for wrong switch type

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4540 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 9229] New: Private default arguments

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9229 Summary: Private default arguments Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 391] .sort and .reverse break utf8 encoding

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=391 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|DMD |druntime

[Issue 6553] Better const(char[]) !- string error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6553 --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 18:50:09 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) All of these compile in 2.061. Got any other test-cases or should we close? Wait, the conversion in foo5 should fail correctly. If it is

[Issue 9230] New: Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9230 Summary: Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 6553] Better const(char[]) !- string error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6553 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 19:02:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) I think this is a regression. Will open a new issue. Opened: Issue 9230 - Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function

[Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9230 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-12-27 20:19:47 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) The implicit immutable conversion on return statement is valid only if the strong purity function has *no parameters*. ...No, this is

[Issue 9214] TickDuration.to should probably be a property

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9214 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9230 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2

[Issue 5905] Error message with const fixed-size array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5905 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4947] Not easy to understand error message with pure and const

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4947 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6559] Compiler message expression formatting does not match phobos

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6559 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME

[Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9230 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9230 --- Comment #4 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-12-28 16:48:43 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Correct requirement is: If all parameters have no mutable indirections, implicit immutable conversion on return statement is allowed.

[Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9218 --- Comment #2 from siegelords_ab...@yahoo.com 2012-12-27 22:02:13 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) Since it's a struct you can also use: int opCmp()(auto const ref A a) const This fails the assert. Otherwise I don't think this is a

[Issue 9177] Wrong `alias func this` incorrectly reports error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9177 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-27 22:36:16 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

  1   2   >