http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9315
Summary: ICE (expression.c:4249, StructLiteralExp::getField)
Tupleof of nested struct literal
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9315
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2013-01-14 00:10:26 PST
---
Moving struct definition outside function does not result in crash.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9098
--- Comment #4 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-14 20:01:19 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
Why on earth aren't the errors gagged while processing code samples?
Because it allows us to catch bugs like
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9174
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9182
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9316
Summary: Version string should be generated from a git tag
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9316
--- Comment #1 from Leandro Lucarella leandro.lucare...@sociomantic.com
2013-01-14 02:54:05 PST ---
Just for reference, this was triggered by
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1469
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9209
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9219
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9240
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9241
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9244
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9262
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8695
Mihail Strashun m.stras...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8695
--- Comment #2 from Mihail Strashun m.stras...@gmail.com 2013-01-14 05:11:11
PST ---
Hm, after some inspection it is not that related, I'll probably make a separate
bugzilla entry after scratching a fix.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9303
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9317
Dicebot m.stras...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.stras...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8695
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Phobos |DMD
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9317
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-01-14 07:02:54 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Quick investigation: this is actually more related to demangleXXX family of
functions in std.traits
Their type system awareness seems a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9317
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9317
--- Comment #4 from Dicebot m.stras...@gmail.com 2013-01-14 07:18:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
In current, the set of valid parameter storage classes is (scope, out ref,
lazy).
And `inout` is always treated as a type qualifier, so is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8695
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-14
07:34:33 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Comment#0 is a compiler issue.
In current, dmd converts 'in' storage class to 'const', not 'const scpope'.
But, I'm not
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9241
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-14
07:39:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I get:
DMD v2.062 DEBUG
testx.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (splitLines(s,
cast(Keep
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9317
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-01-14 07:35:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
In current, the set of valid parameter storage classes is (scope, out ref,
lazy).
And `inout` is always
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9240
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-14
07:43:19 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This is not a bug. See the examples in issue 4251 for how allowing this would
break const.
Exact comment which explains
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9315
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2013-01-14 07:42:16 PST
---
(In reply to comment #2)
I get:
DMD v2.062 DEBUG
Assertion failure: 'index dim' on line 318 in file 'root\root.h'
I updated my dmd to today version, and
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8695
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-01-14 07:47:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
Comment#0 is a compiler issue.
In current, dmd converts 'in' storage class to 'const', not 'const scpope'.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8695
--- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-14
07:52:49 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
In recent Walter says about 'scope': nobody has gotten around to it.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9303
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-14
07:55:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Doesn't happen for me win32+2.062
DMD v2.062 DEBUG
testx.d(11): Error: mixin testx.main.T!() error instantiating
commit
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9318
Summary: stack overflow if struct have alias this to this.init
and has function,in which compare itself with init
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9319
Summary: Unexpected compiles __traits behaviour in a certain
situation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9195
--- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-14 11:49:06 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9305
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-14 11:52:01 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9305
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648
--- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-14 11:56:55 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2420
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.033 |D1 D2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648
--- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-14 12:33:10 PST ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9195
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||SIMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9253
--- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-01-14 13:30:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
This bug is to have a central place to keep the list of Phobos algorithms
found
to be transient-incompatible but could potentially be made
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648
--- Comment #13 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-01-14
14:09:56 PST ---
reverted.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
Summary: Non-POD status of a struct correlated to bad inlining.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9253
--- Comment #3 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-01-14 21:44:56 PST ---
Yeah, some algorithms will have to be transient-unsafe, because it will either
introduce unacceptable overhead, or it's plain impossible due to the nature of
the algorithm.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@me.com
--- Comment
47 matches
Mail list logo