http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9571
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9576
Summary: Symbol Undefined linker error on using
`std.random.MinstdRand`
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4851
jens.k.muel...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jens.k.muel...@gmx.de
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4851
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|and...@erdani.com |nob...@puremagic.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4851
--- Comment #5 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de 2013-02-23 05:49:23 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
3. choice can be expressed via
auto choice = () = randomSample(r, 1, r.length).front;
That looks bad and it's
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9512
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-02-23 06:04:28 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9577
Summary: Crash on static array of function literals
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9512
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9577
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4851
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-02-23 09:45:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Just for clarification. Adding
auto choice(R)(R r) { return randomSample(r, 1, r.length).front; };
would be fine?
When the input is an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9578
Summary: is a nested function and cannot be accessed from
problem
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9552
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9569
Michael p...@m1xa.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@m1xa.com
--- Comment #4
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
--- Comment #35 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-02-23 15:10:03 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9579
Summary: std.regex.replace format argument should not require
same constness as target string
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9580
Summary: std.variant.Algebraic with Tuple format problem
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-02-23
18:36:24 PST ---
And this can be recreated all the way up to 2.062 and 2.063 git-head.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
Summary: Regression (2.053): Exception takes too much time to
show up
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: EH,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-02-23
19:27:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Doesn't this just test the compile time? Not that 4 second compile time is
really acceptable, but I don't know if this test
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
--- Comment #5 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-02-23
19:47:32 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
If what you're testing is the amount of time that it takes an exception to be
thrown and caught, then you shouldn't be doing
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
--- Comment #6 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2013-02-23
20:09:28 PST ---
Also note, the new version prints a stack trace, while the previous doesn't.
Interesting. I wonder if that is what is taking so long.
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
--- Comment #7 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-02-23
20:14:06 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Also note, the new version prints a stack trace, while the previous doesn't.
Interesting. I wonder if that is what is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1680
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9581
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2013-02-23 20:50:30
PST ---
Exceptions in general are overly slow. As I understand it, one of the major
things that could be done would be to make it so that it doesn't actually
26 matches
Mail list logo
