[Issue 6320] non-pure constructor can be called using new

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6320 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 10022] Importing packages

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10022 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8096] Useless error when gagged error destroys type of nested union

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8096 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6169] [CTFE] pure functions cannot compute constants using functions not marked as pure

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 10141] wrong error message with Tuple!(int) : Error: static assert Cannot put a char[] into a Appender!(string)

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10141 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #6

[Issue 6320] non-pure constructor can be called using new

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6320 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |DUPLICATE --- Comment

[Issue 10254] Purity correctness is broken with constructor

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10254 --- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-07-13 23:52:46 PDT --- *** Issue 6320 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 10607] DirEntry has no constructor

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10607 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-14 01:56:18 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 10621] dirEntry is (now) useless

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10621 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-14 01:56:38 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 10637] New: minimallyInitializedArray: postblit on non-initialized...

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 Summary: minimallyInitializedArray: postblit on non-initialized... Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 6829] Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6829 --- Comment #34 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2013-07-14 02:47:24 PDT --- (In reply to comment #33) Interesting. Running dmd -m32 -O works, produces the rotate instructions. For some reason, I still can't coax gdc to do this. I've

[Issue 10589] GC.malloc(sz, GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE) fails after a certain size

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10589 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|druntime|websites

[Issue 10589] GC.malloc(sz, GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE) fails after a certain size

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10589 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2013-07-14 03:32:13 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Ok. I have just some tiny questions left, if you'd care to instruct me: 1. Why does the Place at beginning scheme start at 2K

[Issue 9803] minimallyInitializedArray fails past 1D depth

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9803 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 10637] minimallyInitializedArray: postblit on non-initialized...

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 8860] DMD crashes in post-contract of auto function

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8860 kekeni...@yahoo.co.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 10596] A method with out contract and auto return type causes segfault

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10596 kekeni...@yahoo.co.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kekeni...@yahoo.co.jp ---

[Issue 10638] New: Assignment can't be used as a condition

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10638 Summary: Assignment can't be used as a condition Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 10638] Assignment can't be used as a condition

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10638 mailnew4s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mailnew4s...@gmail.com

[Issue 10638] Assignment can't be used as a condition

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10638 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 10639] New: Win64: wrong optimizer codegen with struct literal with complex fields

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10639 Summary: Win64: wrong optimizer codegen with struct literal with complex fields Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 9510] core.bitop.bsr undefined

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9510 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com

[Issue 10524] case and with() isn't work together

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10524 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 10524] case and with() isn't work together

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10524 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 10640] New: DMD git-head creates instantly segfaulting executables on Linux 64

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10640 Summary: DMD git-head creates instantly segfaulting executables on Linux 64 Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 6829] Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6829 --- Comment #35 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-07-14 07:45:05 PDT --- Interestingly, translating the code into C and compiling with gcc 4.8.1 does produce the rotate instructions. But compiling the D version with gdc 4.8 doesn't. I've no idea

[Issue 6829] Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6829 --- Comment #36 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2013-07-14 08:10:23 PDT --- (In reply to comment #35) Interestingly, translating the code into C and compiling with gcc 4.8.1 does produce the rotate instructions. But compiling the D

[Issue 6829] Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6829 --- Comment #37 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2013-07-14 08:38:50 PDT --- (In reply to comment #36) (In reply to comment #35) Interestingly, translating the code into C and compiling with gcc 4.8.1 does produce the rotate

[Issue 6829] Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6829 --- Comment #38 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-07-14 09:10:08 PDT --- (In reply to comment #37) gdc 4.9.0 20130707 - produces rol/ror instructions. gdc 4.9.0 20130616 - produces rol/ror instructions. gdc 4.9.0 20130505 - produces shl/shr

[Issue 10641] New: array alloc missing APPENDABLE/capacity info

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10641 Summary: array alloc missing APPENDABLE/capacity info Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 10589] GC.malloc(sz, GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE) fails after a certain size

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10589 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 10640] DMD git-head creates instantly segfaulting executables on Linux 64

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10640 Henning Pohl henn...@still-hidden.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 10642] Win64: wrong codegen comparing different sized integer arguments

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2013-07-14 09:57:16 PDT --- Forgot to add that this only happens with optimizations enabled. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 10642] New: Win64: wrong codegen comparing different sized integer arguments

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 Summary: Win64: wrong codegen comparing different sized integer arguments Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 6829] Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6829 --- Comment #39 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2013-07-14 10:28:05 PDT --- (In reply to comment #38) (In reply to comment #37) gdc 4.9.0 20130707 - produces rol/ror instructions. gdc 4.9.0 20130616 - produces rol/ror instructions.

[Issue 10607] DirEntry has no constructor

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10607 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 10643] New: Refused const array struct field initialized with void

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10643 Summary: Refused const array struct field initialized with void Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid

[Issue 10461] Incorrect example of depend on order of evaluation expression

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10461 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 10461] Incorrect example of depend on order of evaluation expression

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10461 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 10461] Incorrect example of depend on order of evaluation expression

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10461 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-14 15:45:45 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org

[Issue 10643] Refused const array struct field initialized with void

2013-07-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10643 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru