[Issue 11250] New: Compile time almost doubled

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11250 Summary: Compile time almost doubled Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component

[Issue 11242] [REG2.064beta] Fails to infer template argument with inout

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11242 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 11230] [REG2.064a] Inexact mangling for template function literal.

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-13 22:52:39 PDT --- Correct test case from bug 11249 comment#0. import std.algorithm; class A { A[] as; } class B { A[] as; } A visit(A a) { a.as.map!(a => visit); return null; } A vis

[Issue 11249] MapResult failed semantic analysis

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11249 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11230] [REG2.064a] Inexact mangling for template function literal.

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 --- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-13 22:53:28 PDT --- *** Issue 11249 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail be

[Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10866 --- Comment #25 from Dmitry Olshansky 2013-10-13 22:52:35 PDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > What happened to making internal_tables.di ? Kills CTFE like I said and hence not an option. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issue

[Issue 11230] [REG2.064a] Inexact mangling for template function literal.

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid Status|RE

[Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4 --- Comment #12 from Denis Shelomovskij 2013-10-14 09:40:59 MSD --- (In reply to comment #11) > This may fix it: > > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2661 Why "may"? It will definitely workaround at in debug mode as it dis

[Issue 11237] zero initializer emitted to read-only data segment, slow compilation

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-13 22:32:37 PDT --- Commit pushed to 2.064 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/056d444ceb70ede8dff9b5fcca5deadb42c21433

[Issue 11249] New: MapResult failed semantic analysis

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11249 Summary: MapResult failed semantic analysis Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 11233] DMD HEAD very slow with large static array struct field

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11233 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 7469] template mangling depends on instantiation order

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7469 --- Comment #3 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-13 16:34:55 PDT --- Fixing this issue would allow us to use the mangling as hash key for looking up existing template instantiations. Currently the template arguments are used for comparison and to compu

[Issue 7469] template mangling depends on instantiation order

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7469 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.c

[Issue 11237] zero initializer emitted to read-only data segment, slow compilation

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11237] zero initializer emitted to read-only data segment, slow compilation

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-13 16:26:27 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/ba8b515e0adc6471aeef0bb1cca6a4092c15c0

[Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10866 --- Comment #24 from Walter Bright 2013-10-13 16:20:23 PDT --- What happened to making internal_tables.di ? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 9769] Remove opEquals from Object

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9769 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-10-13 16:17:16 PDT --- Relevant discussion on how to transition away from having these functions on Object (the thread got broken up a bit - probably by the mailman bug): http://forum.dlang.org/post/m

[Issue 10710] shared phobos library doesn't work on all linux distributions

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10710 --- Comment #22 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-13 16:17:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > There is another solution. Place libcurl dependencies from phobos to deimos, > This is probably the most correct. How? Removing std.net.curl is not an o

[Issue 9770] Remove opCmp from Object

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9770 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-10-13 16:17:23 PDT --- Relevant discussion on how to transition away from having these functions on Object (the thread got broken up a bit - probably by the mailman bug): http://forum.dlang.org/post/m

[Issue 9771] Remove toHash from Object

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9771 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-10-13 16:17:28 PDT --- Relevant discussion on how to transition away from having these functions on Object (the thread got broken up a bit - probably by the mailman bug): http://forum.dlang.org/post/

[Issue 9772] Remove toString from Object

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-10-13 16:17:31 PDT --- Relevant discussion on how to transition away from having these functions on Object (the thread got broken up a bit - probably by the mailman bug): http://forum.dlang.org/post/m

[Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4 --- Comment #11 from Walter Bright 2013-10-13 16:12:34 PDT --- This may fix it: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2661 Need to also check if imports are compiled with one -version while the importer is compiled with another

[Issue 11239] [REG2.064beta] ctRegex causes link errors with -debug since Pull2550

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11239 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment

[Issue 11247] Error: typeof(i).sizeof is used as a type

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11247 --- Comment #3 from Maxim Fomin 2013-10-13 14:33:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > Not sure what to make of this: > > > > > > // > > > void main() > > > { > > > int i; >

[Issue 11247] Error: typeof(i).sizeof is used as a type

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11247 --- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-10-13 14:20:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Not sure what to make of this: > > > > // > > void main() > > { > > int i; > > > > //This is OK: > >

[Issue 11244] Invalid warning about slice assignment

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11244 --- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-10-13 14:16:43 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Probably related: > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11244 > > You put me in an infinite loop. (In r

[Issue 11247] Error: typeof(i).sizeof is used as a type

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11247 Maxim Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru --- Comment #1 fro

[Issue 11248] New: template value parameter cause too long mangling

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11248 Summary: template value parameter cause too long mangling Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 C

[Issue 11244] Invalid warning about slice assignment

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11244 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mailnew4s...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from 999

[Issue 11244] Invalid warning about slice assignment

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11244 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- Co

[Issue 11228] alias this confuses static array copy

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11228 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |regression --- Comment #1 fro

[Issue 11247] New: Error: typeof(i).sizeof is used as a type

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11247 Summary: Error: typeof(i).sizeof is used as a type Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: norm

[Issue 11237] zero initializer emitted to read-only data segment, slow compilation

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2013-10-13 13:12:20 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2660 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 11230] Assertion failed: (type->ty != Tstruct || ((TypeStruct *)type)->sym == this), function semantic, file struct.c, line 876.

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 deadalnix changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11246] [REG 2.063] Struct initialized in constructor is destroyed first

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11246 --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Thaut 2013-10-13 12:16:07 PDT --- To be more percise in dmd 2.062 and earlier the repro case would print ctor 5 dtor Starting with dmd 2.063 this prints ctor dtor dtor -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremag

[Issue 11230] Assertion failed: (type->ty != Tstruct || ((TypeStruct *)type)->sym == this), function semantic, file struct.c, line 876.

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 deadalnix changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10866 --- Comment #23 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-13 12:00:11 PDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > This gets it down to ~90 ms. > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1632 Merged, but the table usage is still flawed. You put one insta

[Issue 11246] New: [REG 2.063] Struct initialized in constructor is destroyed first

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11246 Summary: [REG 2.063] Struct initialized in constructor is destroyed first Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regr

[Issue 11245] [REG 2.063] Can't access length of static arrays from within classes

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11245 --- Comment #2 from Benjamin Thaut 2013-10-13 11:46:54 PDT --- The length of f is known at compile time. There is no need for a this pointer to access it. Also it works if you put the same code into a regular function. It stops working inside

[Issue 11245] [REG 2.063] Can't access length of static arrays from within classes

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11245 rswhi...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rswhi...@googlemail.com ---

[Issue 11233] DMD HEAD very slow with large static array struct field

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11233 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-13 11:36:18 PDT --- Commit pushed to 2.064 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/8f973d947ba262f35e0e0c8e00c1b533389c8fa0

[Issue 11230] Assertion failed: (type->ty != Tstruct || ((TypeStruct *)type)->sym == this), function semantic, file struct.c, line 876.

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 10710] shared phobos library doesn't work on all linux distributions

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10710 --- Comment #21 from Jordi Sayol 2013-10-13 10:29:07 PDT --- There is another solution. Place libcurl dependencies from phobos to deimos, This is probably the most correct. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?

[Issue 11245] New: [REG 2.063] Can't access length of static arrays from within classes

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11245 Summary: [REG 2.063] Can't access length of static arrays from within classes Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 10710] shared phobos library doesn't work on all linux distributions

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10710 --- Comment #20 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-13 09:55:05 PDT --- I think the solution to this is dead simple. Stop cross compiling packages for other distributions and build them from source instead. That would require updated installer scripts /

[Issue 11237] zero initializer emitted to read-only data segment, slow compilation

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Issue 11233] DMD HEAD very slow with large static array struct field

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11233 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-13 09:20:42 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/70028fc5f90ef2753ee684b4a60d6889c5f7ad

[Issue 10710] shared phobos library doesn't work on all linux distributions

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10710 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker --- Comment #19 from Martin No

[Issue 11244] New: Invalid warning about slice assignment

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11244 Summary: Invalid warning about slice assignment Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: regression

[Issue 11139] malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11139 --- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw 2013-10-13 08:15:32 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > This is what happens when you have GC'd memory only being refer

[Issue 11139] malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11139 --- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw 2013-10-13 08:17:06 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Both are correct. Having a look, GC.addRange seems more correct for > struct/classes. > See collection routine in the GC. --- // Scan roots[] mark(roo

[Issue 11139] malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11139 --- Comment #5 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-10-13 08:01:09 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > This is what happens when you have GC'd memory only being referenced by > > > non-GC'd

[Issue 11139] malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11139 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw 2013-10-13 07:52:28 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > This is what happens when you have GC'd memory only being referenced by > > non-GC'd memory. > > According to the original thr

[Issue 11139] malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11139 --- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-10-13 07:48:43 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is what happens when you have GC'd memory only being referenced by > non-GC'd memory. According to the original thread, this would be solved

[Issue 11139] malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11139 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #2 from

[Issue 11243] [REG2.064beta] "dmd -of" fails

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11243 rswhi...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rswhi...@googlemail.com ---

[Issue 11243] New: [REG2.064beta] "dmd -of" fails

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11243 Summary: [REG2.064beta] "dmd -of" fails Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 11242] New: [REG2.064beta] Fails to infer template argument with inout

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11242 Summary: [REG2.064beta] Fails to infer template argument with inout Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression

[Issue 11235] Add analog of TypeTuple that does not auto-expand

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11235 --- Comment #8 from Dicebot 2013-10-13 03:48:30 PDT --- Main problem with nesting is that it does not allow algorithms with variadic amount of tuples. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 11241] New: DIP 37 causes problems

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11241 Summary: DIP 37 causes problems Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 8296] @disable this propagates through reference

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8296 Benjamin Thaut changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from Ben

[Issue 9531] __traits(parent, ...) does not work for types defined within a unittest block

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9531 Benjamin Thaut changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11240] assumeSafeAppend could implicitly break immutablity

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11240 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-10-13 01:44:11 PDT --- I think that making it so that assumeSafeAppend didn't work with const or immutable would be akin to making free not work with const or immutable. Both function are inherently u

[Issue 11240] assumeSafeAppend could implicitly break immutablity

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11240 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #3

[Issue 11240] assumeSafeAppend could implicitly break immutablity

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11240 --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-13 01:18:08 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is this valid though? > > assumeSafeAppend is an unsafe function that *requires* no one else have a view > on the items after the end of the array. > > Jus

[Issue 11237] zero initializer emitted to read-only data segment, slow compilation

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11233] DMD HEAD very slow with large static array struct field

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11233 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 11233] DMD HEAD very slow with large static array struct field

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11233 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #2 from Kenji H

[Issue 11240] assumeSafeAppend could implicitly break immutablity

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11240 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- Co

[Issue 11177] parameterized enum can't be typed

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11177 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 11240] New: assumeSafeAppend could implicitly break immutablity

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11240 Summary: assumeSafeAppend could implicitly break immutablity Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 11215] `inout` lose enclosing `shared` on resolution

2013-10-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201