[Issue 11321] New: Can't link _D6object15__T7reserveTyaZ7reserveFNaNbNeKAyamZm

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11321 Summary: Can't link _D6object15__T7reserveTyaZ7reserveFNaNbNeKAyamZm Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regr

[Issue 11292] Cannot re-initialize a const field in postblit

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11292 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from Kenji

[Issue 11320] New: std.math.fmod, round, trunc are not yet pure

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11320 Summary: std.math.fmod, round, trunc are not yet pure Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: enhanc

[Issue 11319] New: std.range.zip is not yet nothrow

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11319 Summary: std.range.zip is not yet nothrow Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: enhancement

[Issue 11318] New: Internal error: ..\ztc\dt.c 106

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11318 Summary: Internal error: ..\ztc\dt.c 106 Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compo

[Issue 11318] Internal error: ..\ztc\dt.c 106

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11318 --- Comment #1 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-21 14:34:17 PDT --- Forget to say: I use dmd 2.063.2 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 11280] [REG 2.064] Symbol missing although it should be there

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11280 --- Comment #9 from Benjamin Thaut 2013-10-21 13:06:42 PDT --- You have to add my version of the druntime import folder (which is included in the repro case), specify -version=NOGCSAFE and impor thBase.logging to trigger the bug. I can will a

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #6 from safety0ff.bugz 2013-10-21 12:59:27 PDT --- Looking at the non-optimized version of the code, the test instruction operates on dwords, which makes the constant 3 bytes longer (i.e. the difference noted in comment 5,) the co

[Issue 11317] New: glue.c:1218: virtual unsigned int Type::totym(): Assertion `0' failed.

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11317 Summary: glue.c:1218: virtual unsigned int Type::totym(): Assertion `0' failed. Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #5 from safety0ff.bugz 2013-10-21 12:20:33 PDT --- As you can see in the first screen shot, the address for s41 is calculated properly, whereas in the second screenshot the is a mistake. rip for the printf calculation: 0x419c84 r

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #3 from safety0ff.bugz 2013-10-21 12:13:18 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1273) Edb screenshot for second printf -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #4 from safety0ff.bugz 2013-10-21 12:13:49 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1274) Edb screenshot for assert test -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 11316] Some cases of missing delegate argument type inference

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11316 Maxim Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru --- Comment #1 fro

[Issue 11280] [REG 2.064] Symbol missing although it should be there

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11280 --- Comment #8 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-21 11:33:38 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > The actual problem is that optlink also lists > _D6thBase6plugin8ScanPair6__initZ > as unresolved symbol. Mmh, I can't reproduce that. -- Configure iss

[Issue 11280] [REG 2.064] Symbol missing although it should be there

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11280 --- Comment #7 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-21 11:31:12 PDT --- I can also reproduce the described libunres behavior with a minimal test case. struct Foo {} void bar() { Foo[2] foos; } // references Foo.init -- Configure issuemail: http://d.pu

[Issue 11316] New: Some cases of missing delegate argument type inference

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11316 Summary: Some cases of missing delegate argument type inference Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severi

[Issue 11315] dmd: Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcod.c 1561

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11315 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 11280] [REG 2.064] Symbol missing although it should be there

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11280 --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Thaut 2013-10-21 10:54:15 PDT --- The actual problem is that optlink also lists _D6thBase6plugin8ScanPair6__initZ as unresolved symbol. Just like libunres. Which results in my application no longer linking with dm

[Issue 11315] New: dmd: Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcod.c 1561

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11315 Summary: dmd: Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcod.c 1561 Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: ice Severity: normal Priorit

[Issue 11280] [REG 2.064] Symbol missing although it should be there

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11280 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #5 from Marti

[Issue 10911] std.net.curl.HTTP: should allow user code to indicate content type of POST data

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10911 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from hst.

[Issue 10911] std.net.curl.HTTP: should allow user code to indicate content type of POST data

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10911 Sean Kelly changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Issue 1553] foreach_reverse is allowed for delegates

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1553 Denis Shelomovskij changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 11314] New: inline ice with tuple assignment and if/else again

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11314 Summary: inline ice with tuple assignment and if/else again Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 --- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw 2013-10-21 06:14:43 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Ubuntu: > > > > tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) > > > > Debian: > > > > tmpfs on /run/shm typ

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Panteleev 2013-10-21 15:48:46 EEST --- Would setting the TMP environment variable qualify as a workaround? Looking at the implementation of tempDir (which is used in uniqueTempPath, used by std.process), that woul

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 --- Comment #7 from David Nadlinger 2013-10-21 05:40:05 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > /tmp as noexec is a standard in general workplace environments. It might be common in hardened server environments, but I'd argue that's not where peo

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 --- Comment #6 from David Nadlinger 2013-10-21 05:35:43 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ubuntu: > > tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) > > Debian: > > tmpfs on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,rela

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@lycus.org --- Comment #5 f

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw 2013-10-21 05:20:35 PDT --- /tmp as noexec is a standard in general workplace environments. The only packages that break because of noexec are typically third party packages or .bin installers, and is not the n

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 David Nadlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@klickverbot.at --- Comment #3

[Issue 11280] [REG 2.064] Symbol missing although it should be there

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11280 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Thaut 2013-10-21 05:02:20 PDT --- I don't quite understand why this only happens when compiling for 32-bit. It works fine for 64-bit? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Com

[Issue 11313] New: std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 Summary: std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All

[Issue 11313] std.process.ProcessException: Not an executable file on running unittests when /tmp is mounted noexec

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11313 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 11312] Avoid auto-dereference for UFCS functions

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11312 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-10-21 03:20:06 PDT --- Update: The code used to work in 2.062, but fails to work since 2.063.2. Is this a regression? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Issue 11312] New: Avoid auto-dereference for UFCS functions

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11312 Summary: Avoid auto-dereference for UFCS functions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 11311] New: [REG 2.064] Destructor not called on temporary with opIndex + opSlice

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11311 Summary: [REG 2.064] Destructor not called on temporary with opIndex + opSlice Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 safety0ff.bugz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||safety0ff.b...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #2 from safety0ff.bugz 2013-10-21 00:03:26 PDT --- That is the assembly without printf's, btw. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---