[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-24 23:50:29 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #11 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-24 23:51:29 PDT --- Commit pushed to 2.064 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 --- Comment #2 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-24 23:54:24 PDT --- That is so non intuitive. A good example how you can make simple code more complicated. I will wait for the threads in D.learn or possible bug reports for that... --

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #4 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-25 00:01:24 PDT --- After my imagination, a constant member can be assigned as many times as I want, as long as it happens in the constructor. This is only logical. Everything else just makes

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 --- Comment #4 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-25 00:13:09 PDT --- So it was a bug in 2.063.2 and will never change? It's a real _ugly _ restriction and I'm sure that many newbies don't understand that. But thanks for explanation. --

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-10-25 00:10:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) That is so non intuitive. A good example how you can make simple code more complicated. I will wait for the threads in D.learn or

[Issue 8821] countUntil chokes on reference ranges

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8821 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 5233] [patch] std.range.put accepts *any* element type when putting to an array.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5233 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 11349] New: Array!bool should be size_t indexed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11349 Summary: Array!bool should be size_t indexed Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 --- Comment #5 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-25 00:41:49 PDT --- BTW: Your example was an index assignment. Such things could be detected and therefore distinguished of normal assignments. Multiple assignments (as I showed in my two bug

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-10-25 00:52:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) After my imagination, a constant member can be assigned as many times as I want, as long as it happens in the constructor. This is only

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 --- Comment #6 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-25 00:50:39 PDT --- To describe my viewpoint somewhat closer: if (Primitive.Target.Vertex trg) this._targetIds[Primitive.Target.Vertex] = ids++; [1] if (Primitive.Target.Color

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 --- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-10-25 01:00:14 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) So it was a bug in 2.063.2 and will never change? It's a real _ugly _ restriction and I'm sure that many newbies don't understand

[Issue 10710] shared phobos library doesn't work on all linux distributions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10710 --- Comment #44 from Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com 2013-10-25 01:24:55 PDT --- (In reply to comment #43) Did you test these rpm packages on OpenSUSE? Yes, I have latest openSuSE dev machine at work as well, but my primary targets are

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 --- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-10-25 01:29:24 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) To describe my viewpoint somewhat closer: [snip] Unfortunately, AA indexing access and array concatenation also have the possibility of

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 --- Comment #9 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-25 01:32:01 PDT --- I still hate it, but ok, that means for me: no more const for arrays and AA's. Thanks for your time. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 11344] [2.064 beta] Error: object.destroy called with argument types matches both

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11344 --- Comment #2 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-25 02:08:16 PDT --- Seems that there is something wrong with the array specialization. This prints almost the same error messages: - import std.stdio; struct vec2f { public: float[2]

[Issue 11346] [2.064 beta] field initializing not allowed in loops or after labels

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11346 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 11350] New: libphobos2 regex match segfaults when a rare HTTP header is received

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11350 Summary: libphobos2 regex match segfaults when a rare HTTP header is received Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 11351] New: Destructor of with statement expression result is called too soon

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11351 Summary: Destructor of with statement expression result is called too soon Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 11351] Destructor of with statement expression result is called too soon

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11351 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 11309] std.concurrency: OwnerTerminated message doesn't work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu

[Issue 11149] Runtime.args no longer available in static constructors.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11149 --- Comment #18 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-10-25 08:44:13 PDT --- Thanks, that should work indeed. There is at least another regression due to the implicit init/fini of druntime (bug 11309). So I'll fix this and the other bug by make

[Issue 11149] Runtime.args no longer available in static constructors.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11149 --- Comment #19 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2013-10-25 08:59:00 PDT --- BWT, I forgot to mention this. If I recall correctly,_NSGetArgv and _NSGetArgc are private functions. That means, they are not allowed in sandboxed applications, that

[Issue 11149] Runtime.args no longer available in static constructors.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11149 --- Comment #20 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-10-25 09:14:31 PDT --- (In reply to comment #19) Question, how is the runtime initialized now? I mean, is it initialized in a shared module constructor? At least on linux it is done from

[Issue 11149] Runtime.args no longer available in static constructors.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11149 --- Comment #21 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2013-10-25 09:18:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #20) At least on linux it is done from .ctor/.dtor functions that call _d_dso_registry. This is the similar to

[Issue 11352] New: core.time does not check for overflow when converting integrals to a Duration

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11352 Summary: core.time does not check for overflow when converting integrals to a Duration Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 8269] The 'with statement' does not observe temporary object lifetime

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8269 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com

[Issue 11351] Destructor of with statement expression result is called too soon

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11351 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 11353] New: core.time.Duration is missing to() conversion function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11353 Summary: core.time.Duration is missing to() conversion function Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11354] New: dmd2 wont compile properly under C++11/CLang

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11354 Summary: dmd2 wont compile properly under C++11/CLang Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 11349] Array!bool should be size_t indexed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11349 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 11350] libphobos2 regex match segfaults when a rare HTTP header is received

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11350 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 11350] libphobos2 regex match segfaults when a rare HTTP header is received

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11350 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2013-10-25 11:40:08 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) It seems the bug is at: No and I think I know what it is. Maybe is an encoding problem, it seems the input is: print

[Issue 3454] Inconsistent flag setting in GC.realloc()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3454 safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 10701] segfault in GC

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10701 safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 11355] New: Copy through alias this with @disabled this(this)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11355 Summary: Copy through alias this with @disabled this(this) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 10838] Null pointer dereference in gc.gcx.Gcx.isMarked

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10838 safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 11356] New: isASCII for strings

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11356 Summary: isASCII for strings Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos

[Issue 11357] New: Weird behavior of appender with File as the element... do not know exactly where the bug resides.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 Summary: Weird behavior of appender with File as the element... do not know exactly where the bug resides. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows

[Issue 11357] Weird behavior of appender with File as the element... do not know exactly where the bug resides.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 --- Comment #2 from Phil Lavoie maidenp...@hotmail.com 2013-10-25 13:23:38 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1284) Run this and it crashes -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 11357] Weird behavior of appender with File as the element... do not know exactly where the bug resides.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 --- Comment #1 from Phil Lavoie maidenp...@hotmail.com 2013-10-25 13:22:04 PDT --- Version of dmd is 2.063.2 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 9598] Cannot use moveFront on MapResult!(lambda, ByLine!(char, char))

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9598 safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 11357] Weird behavior of appender with File as the element... do not know exactly where the bug resides.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 11358] New: debug import and getUnittests do not mix

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11358 Summary: debug import and getUnittests do not mix Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11353] core.time.Duration is missing to() conversion function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11353 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-10-25 16:00:49 PDT --- Same thing for SysTime: stderr.writefln(Current time: %s, Clock.currTime.msecs); Error: function core.time.dur!msecs.dur (long length) is not

[Issue 11353] core.time.Duration is missing to() conversion function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11353 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-10-25 16:03:12 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Same thing for SysTime: stderr.writefln(Current time: %s, Clock.currTime.msecs); Error: function

[Issue 11357] Weird behavior of appender with File as the element... do not know exactly where the bug resides.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 --- Comment #4 from Phil Lavoie maidenp...@hotmail.com 2013-10-25 16:21:01 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Issue is in appender, that doesn't properlly construct objects when inserting them, it merely assign them. There is an existing

[Issue 11359] New: Assoc range violation when accessed via ref

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11359 Summary: Assoc range violation when accessed via ref Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2

[Issue 11353] core.time.Duration is missing to() conversion function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11353 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 11359] Assoc range violation when accessed via ref

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11359 --- Comment #1 from Puneet Goel pun...@coverify.org 2013-10-25 17:01:08 PDT --- Seems to have got introduced by: 7c6d516d97e43f94c3ef8e8ab072d6714febaf60 2013-10-23 Fix dtor handling issue introduced by fixing 3825 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 11139] malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11139 safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 11360] New: [2.064 beta] Variant fails to compile with void function().

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11360 Summary: [2.064 beta] Variant fails to compile with void function(). Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 11361] New: [2.064 beta] Variant fails to compile with functions/delegates that contain const parameters.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11361 Summary: [2.064 beta] Variant fails to compile with functions/delegates that contain const parameters. Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All

[Issue 11360] [2.064 beta] Variant fails to compile with void function().

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11360 Kapps opantm2+db...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 10851] Stack trace missing for null object access in module constructor

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10851 kekeni...@yahoo.co.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kekeni...@yahoo.co.jp ---