[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11398] Language spec does not allow new eponymous template syntax

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-30 21:36:23 PDT --- Current compiler implementation for DIP42 does not accept following syntax. enum isInteger(T) = is(T == int); // OK enum bool isInteger(T) = is(T == int); // NG The issue is a

[Issue 11397] Language spec does not allow postfix expressions on new expressions

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11397 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 11397] Language spec does not allow postfix expressions on new expressions

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11397 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11395] link error (struct+opEquals) on separate compilation

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11395 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 11397] New: Language spec does not allow postfix expressions on new expressions

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11397 Summary: Language spec does not allow postfix expressions on new expressions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: n

[Issue 11398] New: Language spec does not allow new eponymous template syntax

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 Summary: Language spec does not allow new eponymous template syntax Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 11396] New: Function alias declaration not valid according to spec

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11396 Summary: Function alias declaration not valid according to spec Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 --- Comment #10 from Walter Bright 2013-10-30 20:19:42 PDT --- Not sure - is this fixed or not for 2.064? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 11388] fun (A a) is not callable using argument types (A)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11388 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 11384] unhandled exceptions need to be written to stderr

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11384 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 11388] fun (A a) is not callable using argument types (A)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11388 --- Comment #2 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2013-10-30 19:39:55 PDT --- actually this is probably due to fact that rt/deh2.d is now obsolete. If so, it should be removed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?ta

[Issue 11395] New: link error (struct+opEquals) on separate compilation

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11395 Summary: link error (struct+opEquals) on separate compilation Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: link-failure Severity: reg

[Issue 11394] New: NRVO should work for object field initialization in constructor

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11394 Summary: NRVO should work for object field initialization in constructor Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: wrong

[Issue 11393] GC realloc and free don't ignore interior pointers

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11393 --- Comment #1 from safety0ff.bugz 2013-10-30 18:41:25 PDT --- I suppose this should have been spit into two bugs, but for now we can keep the discussion focused. The reason fixing realloc requires discussion is that fixing this may break ex

[Issue 11393] New: GC realloc and free don't ignore interior pointers

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11393 Summary: GC realloc and free don't ignore interior pointers Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11392] New: dirEntries segfaults (fails in 2.064 beta 4, works in 2.063.2)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11392 Summary: dirEntries segfaults (fails in 2.064 beta 4, works in 2.063.2) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regres

[Issue 10838] Null pointer dereference in gc.gcx.Gcx.isMarked

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10838 safety0ff.bugz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 10701] segfault in GC

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10701 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-30 17:32:34 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/b28fc2b8cc1099d6da7ba935c222

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-10-30 16:49:40 PDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > In 2.064a, the bug 10094 has been fixed. However we need to fix these (at > least > two orthogonal) bugs for the next release. > > I'll open

[Issue 7432] DMD allows variables to be declared as pure

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7432 safety0ff.bugz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alil...@gmail.com --- Comment #19 fro

[Issue 11391] Variables can be marked pure

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11391 safety0ff.bugz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 11391] New: Variables can be marked pure

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11391 Summary: Variables can be marked pure Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 10517] readln(Char)(Char[] buf) accepts non-mutable buffers

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10517 Martin Krejcirik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joanbrugue...@gmail.com --- Commen

[Issue 11374] Wrong UTF-8 decoding when calling File.readln(buf) with typeof(buf) == string.

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11374 Martin Krejcirik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11226] Problems with typeof(null) and const

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11226 --- Comment #1 from Simen Kjaeraas 2013-10-30 14:51:44 PDT --- Another thing that fails with typeof(null): assert(is(typeof(null) : const(typeof(null; -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --

[Issue 11390] const(typeof(null)) fails to print correctly

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11390 Simen Kjaeraas changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Simen Kjaer

[Issue 11390] New: const(typeof(null)) fails to print correctly

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11390 Summary: const(typeof(null)) fails to print correctly Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Compon

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 --- Comment #9 from Martin Krejcirik 2013-10-30 22:23:11 CET --- (In reply to comment #7) > You shouldn't call exit in your thread but simply break the infinite loop. OK, that's probably workable, would be nice if there was some function to c

[Issue 11388] fun (A a) is not callable using argument types (A)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11388 thelastmamm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |regression --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 11382] Bad closure variable with scoped destruction

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Ali Cehreli changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acehr...@yahoo.com --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 11389] New: template arity does not work with function type

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11389 Summary: template arity does not work with function type Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 --- Comment #8 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-30 13:59:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > After merge of pull request #649 I can't compile druntime. > I see, that overload is only available on master but is missing on 2.064. So cherry-picking d

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 k...@redstar.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@redstar.de --- Comment #6 from

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 --- Comment #7 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-30 13:54:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I've noticed the following program now segfaults on exit. In case calling > exit() is now not possible, please document the correct way how to do it (I > h

[Issue 11388] New: fun (A a) is not callable using argument types (A)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11388 Summary: fun (A a) is not callable using argument types (A) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11342] rdmd doesn't exclude phobos etc.c modules

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11342 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Issue 10162] Opposite of std.string.representation

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-10-30 12:42:15 PDT --- See also Issue 11356 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 11387] New: Tuple of dynamic array literal can't be immutable

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11387 Summary: Tuple of dynamic array literal can't be immutable Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: enhan

[Issue 11386] New: Error Message when lvalue required doesn't mention mismatch

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11386 Summary: Error Message when lvalue required doesn't mention mismatch Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhanceme

[Issue 7455] Allow a cast to discard precision from a floating point during constant folding

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7455 --- Comment #9 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-30 11:55:13 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Programs that rely on a maximum accuracy need to be rethought. > It's more like programs that rely on a defined precision. When I write cast(float)a == cast

[Issue 6531] assertion failure in std.range.iota

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6531 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #12 from Martin Nowak

[Issue 11385] New: XXX is a nested function and cannot be accessed from XXX

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11385 Summary: XXX is a nested function and cannot be accessed from XXX Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major

[Issue 6531] assertion failure in std.range.iota

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6531 --- Comment #11 from Martin Nowak 2013-10-30 11:24:42 PDT --- > Indeed, casting does not seem sufficient to force correct rounding of > intermediate results. > Seems like the solution is to either assign and force rounding, or use > approxEqual

[Issue 6531] assertion failure in std.range.iota

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6531 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acehr...@yahoo.com --- Comment #10 from

[Issue 9877] Assertion failure in iota for float parameters

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9877 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 11330] Directory named as imported module should not stop module search

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11330 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Martin Krejcirik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 11330] Directory named as imported module should not stop module search

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11330 --- Comment #17 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-30 10:14:33 PDT --- Commit pushed to 2.064 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/eb1b00441491f1be554892963358462506c7840

[Issue 11384] New: unhandled exceptions need to be written to stderr

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11384 Summary: unhandled exceptions need to be written to stderr Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: pull Severity: regression

[Issue 10701] segfault in GC

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10701 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #5 from Marti

[Issue 11365] Allow D source file names to have no extension (or an arbitrary extension)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Co

[Issue 11365] Allow D source file names to have no extension (or an arbitrary extension)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365 --- Comment #7 from Leandro Lucarella 2013-10-30 08:41:42 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I just updated the title of the issue, arbitrary extension names should be > > allowed for the same reason. > > So you

[Issue 11365] Allow D source file names to have no extension (or an arbitrary extension)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365 --- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-10-30 08:36:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I just updated the title of the issue, arbitrary extension names should be > allowed for the same reason. So you're the one adding this. What benefit

[Issue 11365] Allow D source file names to have no extension (or an arbitrary extension)

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comm

[Issue 11381] warn/error when static if else ladder has no matching block (or misses "else")

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11381 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comm

[Issue 11383] New: Some array casts incorrectly rejected in safe code

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11383 Summary: Some array casts incorrectly rejected in safe code Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: norm

[Issue 11330] Directory named as imported module should not stop module search

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11330 --- Comment #16 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-30 07:42:13 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/671161e4d5340afcb618c6cf3ded2c6d991a8

[Issue 10520] Building with profiler results in "is not nothrow" error on some contracts

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10520 Denis Shelomovskij changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLI

[Issue 11382] Bad closure variable with scoped destruction

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Maxim Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru --- Comment #2 fro

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #15 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-30 03:12:27 PDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #8) > > A little test program: [snip] Hmm, strange. After moving out the nested static function 'make' to module level, I got this

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #14 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-30 03:00:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Who? Embedded system programmers, for example. --- We can add some acceptable cases certainly. For example, by the following rule: "If the static array

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-10-30 02:43:17 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > this(int x) { > static int[3] make(int x) pure { > int[3] a; > a[0] = x; > a[1] = x + 1; >

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #12 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-30 01:52:32 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Couldn't the compiler to this dirty trick for me? > > If he found such multiple init case, he could rewrite the c

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #11 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-30 01:49:54 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Couldn't the compiler to this dirty trick for me? > If he found such multiple init case, he could rewrite the code. So that this > code: > > this(int

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #10 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-30 01:44:17 PDT --- Couldn't the compiler to this dirty trick for me? If he found such multiple init case, he could rewrite the code. So that this code: this(int x, size_t i) { arr[0

[Issue 11343] [2.064 beta] Error: multiple field initialization

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 --- Comment #9 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-10-30 01:24:58 PDT --- This is annoying. If I want to initialize an const array I must write a new function? No way. The easier way (and I'm sure the most users will do this) is to get rid of con

[Issue 11149] Runtime.args no longer available in static constructors.

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11149 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11309] std.concurrency: OwnerTerminated message doesn't work

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-30 00:21:40 PDT --- Commit pushed to 2.064 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/7c396ef4080737928e68bdb2550e40

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 11378] implicit runtime initialization/finalization is broken

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-30 00:13:11 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/dc559c3ef2916102c6f295d70c39

[Issue 11309] std.concurrency: OwnerTerminated message doesn't work

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 --- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-30 00:13:17 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/b73e2c4554db5bb67ceb51adb053e

[Issue 11149] Runtime.args no longer available in static constructors.

2013-10-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11149 --- Comment #26 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-30 00:13:25 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/d3c89cf1894aefa884303344a184