[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #12 from Kenji Hara 2014-02-15 23:43:09 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > From where do I get the correct snn.lib? Currently it is in 2.064.zip. http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2013/dmd.2.064.zip -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 4417] uniform() doesn't check constness of RNG

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4417 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 23:37:19 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/26eecf465162ec60a8d7b595a1e72f9b

[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #11 from Mar

[Issue 11282] std.process: add capability for two-way inter-process communication without deadlock

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11282 --- Comment #12 from Vladimir Panteleev 2014-02-16 09:34:33 EET --- Ping? Does that design satisfy your requirements? Can I (or someone else) go ahead with implementing it? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.c

[Issue 12046] Rebindable supports arrays

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 --- Comment #8 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-02-15 23:28:28 PST --- (In reply to comment #7)> > However, I'm not sure what you expect to happen here. Rebindable has supported > arrays for several years now. We can't just remove it. > > Re

[Issue 12144] [REG DMD2.064] Unresolved xopEquals when referenced by dynamic array constructor

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12144 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 22:03:43 PST --- Commits pushed to 2.065 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/ef0b1445ccb8492ec64d78da5583e0cbb380e1

[Issue 12144] [REG DMD2.064] Unresolved xopEquals when referenced by dynamic array constructor

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12144 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 12167] GIT HEAD: AAs are broken

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12167 --- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara 2014-02-15 21:23:58 PST --- This is one another regression caused by removing object.AssociativeArray. struct S11 { int opCmp(T : typeof(this))(T) { return 0; } } void main() { { auto ti = typeid(int[S11]);

[Issue 12144] [REG DMD2.064] Unresolved xopEquals when referenced by dynamic array constructor

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12144 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 20:47:27 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/0cf5608cd9a0041e3c47290dd52f737b40fce

[Issue 12168] [REG2.065a] Add ref to array() and object() of JSONValue getters to add new element

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12168 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 12167] GIT HEAD: AAs are broken

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12167 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from ye

[Issue 12071] Algebraic won't take delegate returning structure

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12071 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 19:23:10 PST --- Commit pushed to 2.065 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/d430dd14d63c68aae3dae1fc0cacc4de2

[Issue 12051] Wrong code with ?: resulting in char on x86-64

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12051 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 19:23:10 PST --- Commit pushed to 2.065 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b1ba7340cf028a3fd9857de2980b6eb611c0cae

[Issue 7690] std.string.join of const string array too

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7690 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 12179] [ICE](e2ir.c 1861) with array operation

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12179 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Co

[Issue 12121] atomicLoad!(MemoryOrder.acq) should not emit additional code on X86

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12121 Stanislav Blinov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 12121] atomicLoad!(MemoryOrder.acq) should not emit additional code on X86

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12121 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 15:40:42 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/391573925590cf042d1d10345b0

[Issue 12046] Rebindable supports arrays

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 --- Comment #7 from Peter Alexander 2014-02-15 15:34:38 PST --- Sorry for closing, should have read the bug more carefully. However, I'm not sure what you expect to happen here. Rebindable has supported arrays for several years now. We can'

[Issue 3794] Phobos' socket.receive should assert on the length of the target array

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 Stanislav Blinov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stanislav.bli...@gmail.com --- Com

[Issue 10958] std.variant : Variant and Algebraic can't use a type when sizeof == 0

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10958 Kapps changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 10958] std.variant : Variant and Algebraic can't use a type when sizeof == 0

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10958 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 14:55:44 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/b21c398ca2aad2934af4eec31dc4cf2

[Issue 12046] Rebindable supports arrays

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|F

[Issue 11110] Variant.convertsTo doesn't work like isImplicitlyConvertible

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=0 Kapps changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 7069] Variant Doesn't Handle Const or Immutable Contents

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7069 Kapps changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 12046] Rebindable supports arrays

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 12046] Rebindable supports arrays

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 14:01:15 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/f8aa638c5a78401006784b2b9f7ad45

[Issue 516] Mutually calling constructors allowed

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=516 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3794] Phobos' socket.receive should assert on the length of the target array

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.alexander...@gmail.co

[Issue 3830] opCmp among variant arrays

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3830 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.alexander...@gmail.co

[Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 --- Comment #79 from Andrej Mitrovic 2014-02-15 12:50:07 PST --- (In reply to comment #77) > @Andrej Mitrovic > You forgott the -m64 switch in your test. You are testing 32-bit binaries. My bad. It's a huge thread and I didn't notice this. I

[Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 --- Comment #77 from Benjamin Thaut 2014-02-15 12:31:09 PST --- @Andrej Mitrovic You forgott the -m64 switch in your test. You are testing 32-bit binaries. The problem is not the 64 bit operating system it is the 64-bit executable, as 64 bit

[Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 --- Comment #78 from Vladimir Panteleev 2014-02-15 22:31:49 EET --- (In reply to comment #76) > I can't reproduce this on Win7 x64 with 2.064. Here's the results for me: The problem applies to 64-bit programs. I can reproduce it with -m64.

[Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comm

[Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 --- Comment #75 from Vladimir Panteleev 2014-02-15 22:17:15 EET --- (In reply to comment #63) > So we have stack traces on all platforms by now, can I close the bug? What about line numbers? I think we only have them on Win64. > Regarding D

[Issue 12046] Rebindable supports arrays

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.alexander...@gmail.co

[Issue 7654] Direct using of Rebindable!T doesn't work

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7654 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 12179] [ICE](e2ir.c 1861) with array operation

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12179 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Com

[Issue 7654] Direct using of Rebindable!T doesn't work

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7654 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 11:06:46 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/c9fe9679d43de8b960bb0bfcb208637d

[Issue 12167] GIT HEAD: AAs are broken

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12167 --- Comment #5 from Temtaime 2014-02-15 09:57:44 PST --- Do not sorry :) It's my mistake i had to do it by myself -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --

[Issue 12167] GIT HEAD: AAs are broken

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12167 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev 2014-02-15 19:46:50 EET --- Sorry about that. Didn't look at the code too closely, didn't realize it contained statements that needed to be wrapped in functions. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.pure

[Issue 12167] GIT HEAD: AAs are broken

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12167 --- Comment #3 from Temtaime 2014-02-15 09:42:14 PST --- http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/9c0ffd7fcadb All my examples previously worked. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this ma

[Issue 12167] GIT HEAD: AAs are broken

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12167 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Co

[Issue 12177] inout(Cycle!(string[2])) implicit cast problem

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12177 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Co

[Issue 12164] Function returning ptrdiff_t.min in 64-bit returning 0 when -O is set.

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12164 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from ye

[Issue 12163] pdb debugging (win64): stepping loops points to incorrect lines

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12163 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from ye

[Issue 12155] Better line and column numbers for missing semicolon

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12155 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic 2014-02-15 07:55:14 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Bearophile - the only person around who constantly re-reports their own bugs. So much so that I have a special entry for his bugs in my speed dial in

[Issue 9477] String (and array) comparisons are needlessly very slow

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9477 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comm

[Issue 9477] String (and array) comparisons are needlessly very slow

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9477 --- Comment #5 from yebblies 2014-02-16 02:56:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > @Daniel: I thought we need to close bugs that were not fixed in the current > development iteration as WORKSFORME? Otherwise they'll end up in this > iteration

[Issue 12148] std.uuid.parseUUID should document that it changes lvalue input data

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12148 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Summary|The

[Issue 9477] String (and array) comparisons are needlessly very slow

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9477 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev 2014-02-15 17:44:19 EET --- @Daniel: I thought we need to close bugs that were not fixed in the current development iteration as WORKSFORME? Otherwise they'll end up in this iteration's changelog. -- C

[Issue 11684] SIGSEGV with ld.bfd version 2.22

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11684 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com --- Comment #21 from

[Issue 11630] shared library segv

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11630 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 12155] Better line and column numbers for missing semicolon

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12155 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from ye

[Issue 12153] Ternary operator on static array lvalues creates copy

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12153 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from ye

[Issue 3720] Taking address of member functions possible without an instance

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3720 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||destructiona...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 f

[Issue 12154] Address of a member function doesn't tell about this - breaks std.concurrency

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12154 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 12151] Diagnostic for .dup/.idup should emit code before the internal rewrite

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12151 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from ye

[Issue 9477] String (and array) comparisons are needlessly very slow

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9477 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution|WORKS

[Issue 12179] New: [ICE](e2ir.c 1861) with array operation

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12179 Summary: [ICE](e2ir.c 1861) with array operation Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compo

[Issue 12170] sum(double[]) is not pure nothrow

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12170 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 06:49:39 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > The problem is this: > > "Cyclic functions (i.e. functions that wind up directly or indirectly calling > themselves) are inferred as being impur

[Issue 12170] sum(double[]) is not pure nothrow

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12170 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|sum(double[]) is not pure |sum(double[]) is not pure

[Issue 12169] sum(int[]) should return a int

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12169 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 06:38:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > If sum returned int for ranges of int, it would be 100% identical to > std.algorithm.reduce. If it's equal to what reduce does, it gives less s

[Issue 12169] sum(int[]) should return a int

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12169 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 06:32:29 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is by design in the code, presumably to avoid overflow (which you are > usually so concerned about, what changed?) I have tens of usages of

[Issue 12173] Optional start value for std.algorithm.sum

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12173 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 06:29:14 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Doesn't an add outside the sum call do the same? An add outside the sum doesn't solve the problem with Foo. Another example: long[] data = [..

[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #10 from Kenji Hara 2014-02-15 06:24:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > The correct snn.lib is: > > 08/03/2013 12:20 AM 567,808 snn.lib OK, understand. I copied snn.lib from dmd2.064.zip to c:/dm/lib (dmc library

[Issue 12173] Optional start value for std.algorithm.sum

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12173 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@erdani.com --- Comment

[Issue 12169] sum(int[]) should return a int

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12169 --- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2014-02-15 06:15:26 PST --- If sum returned int for ranges of int, it would be 100% identical to std.algorithm.reduce. It's worth returning a 64-bit quantity because (a) 64-bit summing is about as fast

[Issue 12170] sum(double[]) is not pure

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12170 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.alexander...@gmail.co

[Issue 12169] sum(int[]) should return a int

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12169 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.alexander...@gmail.co

[Issue 11945] LockingTextWriter fails with repeat

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11945 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11903] Internal error: backend/cgcs.c 351

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11903 Damian changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian...@hotmail.co.uk --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 11945] LockingTextWriter fails with repeat

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11945 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-15 04:47:57 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/5dbb6539e3bce241ccea886ebef9ad1

[Issue 12163] pdb debugging (win64): stepping loops points to incorrect lines

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12163 --- Comment #5 from Manu 2014-02-15 04:15:03 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ohh, your expected output is incorrect. > The test is (i != 3) not (i == 3). Haha, true. Yeah sorry about that. Perfect example of how the existing debugging exp

[Issue 12163] pdb debugging (win64): stepping loops points to incorrect lines

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12163 --- Comment #6 from Manu 2014-02-15 04:19:53 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > 13 } <-- missing/questionable I should add, I don't think this is questionable at all. All C compiler's I've ever used (many!) do this

[Issue 2776] pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 --- Comment #13 from Jacob Carlborg 2014-02-15 04:08:38 PST --- (In reply to comment #12) > But it already was, he just changed D.X into D1. Just because it's set to DMD 1.x doesn't mean it's only for D1. The creator of the bug report could

[Issue 12178] New: ddoc arbitrarily injects tabs instead of spaces in the output

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12178 Summary: ddoc arbitrarily injects tabs instead of spaces in the output Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: ddoc

[Issue 2776] pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 --- Comment #12 from Andrej Mitrovic 2014-02-15 03:33:51 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > > Because there are some bugs that are marked "D1 & D2" which /are/ actually > > both > > D1 and D2 bugs. We shouldn'

[Issue 2776] pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 --- Comment #11 from Jacob Carlborg 2014-02-15 03:30:32 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) > Because there are some bugs that are marked "D1 & D2" which /are/ actually > both > D1 and D2 bugs. We shouldn't introduce false-positives. Then set

[Issue 12177] New: inout(Cycle!(string[2])) implicit cast problem

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12177 Summary: inout(Cycle!(string[2])) implicit cast problem Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: reg

[Issue 7666] A function to reverse the items of a tuple

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7666 --- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 03:21:05 PST --- The presence of this function solves the problem of choosing what's the right API for the Phobos-defined array.reverse: for API uniformity is should be like this one, so ar

[Issue 10318] Built-in array sort usage warning, then deprecation, and finally removal

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10318 --- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 03:24:26 PST --- Regarding the API of the Phobos-defined array.reverse see: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7666#c13 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues

[Issue 2776] pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 --- Comment #10 from Andrej Mitrovic 2014-02-15 03:11:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > Not yet. But Walter is only converting the tags from D1.x to D1, and D2.x to > > D2. > > I see. But why not set it to

[Issue 4725] std.algorithm.sum()

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4725 --- Comment #31 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 03:12:07 PST --- See also Issue 12176 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 12176] New: Possible std.algorithm.sum optimization for short fixed-size arrays

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12176 Summary: Possible std.algorithm.sum optimization for short fixed-size arrays Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 12165] std.file.rmdirRecurse can't delete symbolic links or directory junctions

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12165 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2776] pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 --- Comment #9 from Jacob Carlborg 2014-02-15 02:57:36 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) > Not yet. But Walter is only converting the tags from D1.x to D1, and D2.x to > D2. I see. But why not set it to "D1 & D2" when it's uncertain? Unless i

[Issue 4725] std.algorithm.sum()

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4725 --- Comment #30 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 02:53:59 PST --- See also Issue 12175 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 12175] New: More efficient very common case for std.algorithm.sum

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12175 Summary: More efficient very common case for std.algorithm.sum Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 4725] std.algorithm.sum()

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4725 --- Comment #29 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 02:46:55 PST --- Probably not related: Issue 12174 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 12174] New: Problems caused by enum predicate with std.algorithm.sum

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12174 Summary: Problems caused by enum predicate with std.algorithm.sum Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: wrong-c

[Issue 2776] pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 --- Comment #8 from Andrej Mitrovic 2014-02-15 02:44:31 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Has this been verified to be only for D1? Not yet. But Walter is only converting the tags from D1.x to D1, and D2.x to D2. -- Configure issuemail: h

[Issue 4725] std.algorithm.sum()

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4725 --- Comment #28 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 02:35:00 PST --- See also Issue 12173 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 12173] New: Optional start value for std.algorithm.sum

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12173 Summary: Optional start value for std.algorithm.sum Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 2776] pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 --- Comment #7 from Jacob Carlborg 2014-02-15 02:19:43 PST --- Has this been verified to be only for D1? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 7666] A function to reverse the items of a tuple

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7666 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 12135] [AA] Format tail after associative array value is treated as separator if explicit separator is empty

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12135 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 12172] New: Refused sum(transversal)

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12172 Summary: Refused sum(transversal) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority

[Issue 4725] std.algorithm.sum()

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4725 --- Comment #27 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-15 02:01:58 PST --- Another problem is in Issue 12172 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 12163] pdb debugging (win64): stepping loops points to incorrect lines

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12163 Manu changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical --- Comment #3 from Manu 2014-02-15

[Issue 12163] pdb debugging (win64): stepping loops points to incorrect lines

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12163 --- Comment #4 from yazan.dab...@gmail.com 2014-02-15 01:59:01 PST --- Ohh, your expected output is incorrect. The test is (i != 3) not (i == 3). And so, the expected output is: 2int[] things = [1,2,3,4]; 4foreach(i; things) 6 i

  1   2   >