https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12190
Summary: runtime loaded shared library on osx: partially worked
in 2.062, fails since 2.063
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12169
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-18 03:23:57 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> presumably to avoid overflow (which you are
> usually so concerned about, what changed?)
This after very few seconds of run time prints the wr
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12189
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #1
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7029
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from yeb
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137
--- Comment #14 from yebblies 2014-02-19 00:37:33 EST ---
It would be nice to be able to test this. Is there a way to get the version of
snn.lib? If not, could one be added? Then we could at least have a unittest
rather than a silent perfo
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12191
Summary: bad purity propagation for double-nested delegate
templates
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192
--- Comment #3 from tcak 2014-02-18 08:11:31
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=1329)
Used makefile
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192
--- Comment #4 from tcak 2014-02-18 08:11:55
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=1330)
Output of make
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192
Summary: Wrong interface file content generated that crashes
compiler
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Sev
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192
--- Comment #1 from tcak 2014-02-18 08:10:35
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=1327)
Library source code
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192
--- Comment #2 from tcak 2014-02-18 08:11:04
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=1328)
Generated interface file
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11363
--- Comment #2 from Sobirari Muhomori 2014-02-18
08:32:00 PST ---
workDirFD = open(toStringz(workDir), O_RDONLY);
How this behaves if workDir is not null, but empty?
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193
Summary: GIT HEAD: opOpAssign ignored if this aliases to bool
value
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regressio
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11478
--- Comment #6 from Martin Nowak 2014-02-18 09:17:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This still fails. it only works when adding import core.runtime inside 'foo.d'
So it crashes if you don't import core.runtime?
This might be an ODR proble
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
Summary: Constructor prevents static opCall regression?
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12182
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic 2014-02-18
12:36:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I knew this was going to be a problem as soon I saw the pull implementing the
> change. But some pople insist on destroying any means of defining a de
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Com
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
Dmitry Olshansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitry.o...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12188
--- Comment #1 from Peter Alexander 2014-02-18
12:51:15 PST ---
BTW, you may already know this, but it's impossible to solve this with the
current range primitives. See the discussion here:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12188
--- Comment #2 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2014-02-18 13:14:25 PST ---
Hmm this sucks. It didn't occur to me that takeN on a bidirectional range
doesn't return a bidirectional range. :-( In retrospect, it makes sense (takeN
doesn't know the i
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12195
Summary: Cannot directly instantiate a template produced by
aponymous template instantiation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12196
Summary: Bad error message for multiple declarations
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: minor
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12197
Summary: 'invalid array operation' errror message with valid
array operation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywor
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12198
Summary: Catch some wrong overlapping array operations at
compile time
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: di
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
Max Samukha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samu...@voliacable.com
--- Comment #4
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
Jesse Phillips changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.co
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11630
Stanislav Blinov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stanislav.bli...@gmail.com
--- Co
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Co
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12199
Summary: RedBlackTree problematic with non-string predicates
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12167
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara 2014-02-18 18:38:54 PST ---
This change has been introduced to fix the language design issue discovered by
bug 12070 (the diagnostic message is added by issue 12124).
In D1 age, historically static opCall was a
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
--- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara 2014-02-18 18:41:25 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> this of course means tracking down the places which need
> fixed is not helped by the compiler.
> this of course means tracking down the places which need
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
--- Comment #2 from
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|regression |normal
--- Comment #20 from Kenji Hara
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
--- Comment #9 from Jesse Phillips 2014-02-18
20:02:35 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> You can make error at the all places that using `static Struct opCall()`, by
> replacing it to `@disable this();`.
Perfect recommendation, thank you.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12189
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-18 20:45:33 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/0efdb40eb05920f370e10e15926f9b35f1698
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12189
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Panteleev 2014-02-19
06:46:46 EET ---
Thanks, I didn't think about that.
If "out" did not allow escaping references then I guess it would be different.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/us
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12200
Summary: Strange crash while debugging in Win64
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Comp
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12200
--- Comment #1 from Manu 2014-02-18 21:22:19 PST ---
Interestingly, the disassembly's very different in the actual context where I'm
experiencing this, but it still happens.
The disasm:
case '[':++depth; step[depth] = 24;brea
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12195
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1566
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samu...@voliacable.com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1566
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara 201
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12201
Summary: Crash on bad import within mixed in template
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice
Severity: normal
Pr
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12186
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
Platform|x86
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12200
Rainer Schuetze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #2
49 matches
Mail list logo
