https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #15 from wihkman 2014-03-20 20:02:07 PDT ---
Why is reduce (sorry, fold) allowing multiple function arguments in the first
place?
If you want to compose functions to avoid another O(n) iteration, then you
should compose the reduce
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-20 18:28:41 PDT ---
>Furthermore, it also improves usability by making the seeds passed by
>parameter pack, instead of forcing the use of a tuple.<
OK. (Despite in a modern language tuples s
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7009
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis 2014-03-20 16:18:45
PDT ---
> We can still introduce countChars and removeChars aliases. And later deprecate
the others.
That would still be renaming them. Maybe we could add new aliases, but we can't
rem
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6741
--- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer 2014-03-20
12:57:35 PDT ---
It's a bug because when the object is cast implicitly to immutable, it does not
affect the context pointer. In essence, the delegate captures the instance when
it was mutabl
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #13 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 12:32:49 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > How about "fold" instead, that's the classical functional programming name
> > for
> > that. Also there is foldl
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #33 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-20 12:06:10 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/a17bf889365ccd1d61937b7e45b
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12423
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Com
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12426
Summary: Spurious "auto can only be used for template function
parameters" for overloaded templated functions
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12425
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- C
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12425
Summary: allow default values for "auto ref"
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Componen
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9203
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||spec
URL|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8074
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Com
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12387
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comme
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12387
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from ye
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6574
--- Comment #3 from Infiltrator 2014-03-20 05:54:44
PDT ---
That's very odd. For me, the infloop only happens with my v2.062 gdc; my
v2.065 dmd and dpaste's v2.065 both give the warning and output of "dispatch,
Foo A".
--
Configure issuema
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12424
Summary: Cannot do qualifier-overload with mixin template.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5665
Dmitry Olshansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
--- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 04:20:02 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
> > Yeah. I think the best thing to do at this point is to just let it be.
>
> Really?
As Peter said, fixing it wou
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12423
Summary: extern(Windows) interfaces with -m64 broken
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7009
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-20 03:56:17 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> No. We're not doing that anymore. At this point, we're stuck with whatever
> names we have. We've come too far along for breakage based on naming
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12422
Summary: Templated nested function is inferred as `pure` even
if it calls impure functions
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- C
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12413
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Co
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2014-03-20
03:24:24 PDT ---
A slightly more fair comparison if we take into account that 'static' acts as
'auto':
-
void main()
{
import std.algorithm;
import std.traits;
{
static
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
Summary: Allow simpler syntax for lambda template declarations
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
Summary: [AA] Can't set associative array with array as key
value using key type
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severi
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Summary: assertion failure in std.utf
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
--- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 01:51:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Urgh, fixing this is going to be a breaking change, but not necessarily fix
bugs.
Yeah. I think the best thing to do at this point is to just le
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6496
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2014-03-19 21:45:33
PDT ---
> Jonathan, did you end up forgetting about this? :P
Yes, though the bug was created so that we as a community would have a note to
take care of this and thus remember to. Any
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5870
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7018
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lt.infiltra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7125
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6978
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6961
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lt.infiltra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2413
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5870
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-19 21:52:12 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/ee2d46263bedd6b58663fa710690f533
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6574
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic 2014-03-20
01:11:38 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> As of v2.065, the provided code compiles and runs without errors. Taking out
> the 'Foo!();' line causes a compilation warning about a size change but
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7089
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lt.infiltra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7009
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lt.infiltra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6496
--- Comment #3 from Infiltrator 2014-03-19 21:51:43
PDT ---
Good point about this bug report.
Since you know the situation better than I, could you please list here which
changes actually need to be made?
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Summary: Add module for C-strings support
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7006
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lt.infiltra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6980
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lt.infiltra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12408
--- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 02:02:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I thought that the whole point of using inout was to avoid having to
> copy-paste code between mutable, const, and immutable functions?
Yes, tha
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7009
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis 2014-03-19 23:58:23
PDT ---
> Seeing as how they do not appear to have been replaced yet, should we think
about renaming them to camel case now?
No. We're not doing that anymore. At this point, we're stuc
45 matches
Mail list logo
