[Issue 12441] New: DDoc should ignore interleaved non-doc comments

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12441 Summary: DDoc should ignore interleaved non-doc comments Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 C

[Issue 3882] Unused result of pure functions

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882 --- Comment #36 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-22 15:16:12 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/07d4e3e121c1558f7a6bdf08049f4cb631ef5

[Issue 9515] UFCS fails with local aliases

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9515 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICAT

[Issue 11461] `Error`s are not thrown as `pure nothrow` functions are optimized out with "-O -release"

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461 --- Comment #13 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-22 14:59:11 PDT --- Maybe the problem can be worked around by making the function(s) *weakly* pure? (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Commit pushed to master at > > h

[Issue 12434] std.algorithm.sum of immutable array too

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12434 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- C

[Issue 12440] Implement whole-program analysis

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12440 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- C

[Issue 12440] New: Implement whole-program analysis

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12440 Summary: Implement whole-program analysis Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle and small usage change

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106 --- Comment #11 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling 2014-03-22 11:10:28 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Is randomSample a documented alias? "Is"? I haven't even made the patch yet :-P But yes, it will be. > Then I suggest to fix the API of d

[Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle and small usage change

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106 --- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-22 10:58:29 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > to switch randomSample => sample (again maintaining an alias for the older > name). Is randomSample a documented alias? > For this first > it

[Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle and small usage change

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106 --- Comment #9 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling 2014-03-22 10:42:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Initially, I would have been against the renaming. The main argument would be > that what we have now is consistent as a set of randomization

[Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle and small usage change

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106 Ivan Kazmenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ga...@mail.ru --- Comment #8 from Iva

[Issue 11461] `Error`s are not thrown as `pure nothrow` functions are optimized out with "-O -release"

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- C

[Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle and small usage change

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-22 05:30:12 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Is there any favour for renaming the other randomSomething functions and types > in this way? Note that one rationale for the existing names is by

[Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle and small usage change

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-22 05:28:41 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Is there any favour for renaming the other randomSomething functions and types > in this way? Note that one rationale for the existing names is by

[Issue 11461] `Error`s are not thrown as `pure nothrow` functions are optimized out with "-O -release"

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de --- Comment #11

[Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle and small usage change

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106 Joseph Rushton Wakeling changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph.wakel...@webdrake.ne

[Issue 12439] New: Can't access to property call result if the call is in parantheses

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12439 Summary: Can't access to property call result if the call is in parantheses Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: r

[Issue 12438] New: Wrong code for result of assignment to `ref`/`out` struct parameter

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12438 Summary: Wrong code for result of assignment to `ref`/`out` struct parameter Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: