[Issue 12990] utf8 string not read/written to windows console

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12990 --- Comment #6 from Sum Proxy --- I also tried it on a 32-bit windows system and the behavior is the same - no output. --

[Issue 13013] Failed unittests in std.json - does not parse doubles correctly

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13013 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/333e7e734f30067acbb935adfdf6d2ef64f50b8c Issue 13013 - Converte

[Issue 13029] New: cumulate for std.algorithm

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13029 Issue ID: 13029 Summary: cumulate for std.algorithm Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1

[Issue 12655] foldRange

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12655 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Optionally the a+b could be the default operation, like in C++: [10, 20, 30, 40].foldRange(0) ==> [0, 10, 30, 60, 100] --

[Issue 13029] cumulate for std.algorithm

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13029 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #

[Issue 13029] cumulate for std.algorithm

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13029 jens.k.muel...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 12655] foldRange

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12655 jens.k.muel...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.k.muel...@gmx.de --- Comment #2

[Issue 13030] New: DMD assertion fails at mtype.c:697 if delegate has an argument name

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13030 Issue ID: 13030 Summary: DMD assertion fails at mtype.c:697 if delegate has an argument name Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status:

[Issue 13031] New: `continue` with label causes compiler to think code after loop can be executed

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13031 Issue ID: 13031 Summary: `continue` with label causes compiler to think code after loop can be executed Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All S

[Issue 13032] New: std.internal.math.gammfunction assumes 80-bit real

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13032 Issue ID: 13032 Summary: std.internal.math.gammfunction assumes 80-bit real Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major P

[Issue 12106] Formatting syntax for a range of typecons tuples

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12106 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --

[Issue 13026] object.get cannot be called with [] as "defaultValue" argument

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13026 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --- Comment #

[Issue 13032] std.internal.math.gammfunction assumes 80-bit real

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13032 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Pfau --- Sorry, testing is not as simple as I initially thought. Mixing code compiled with -mlong-double-64 and code compiled without is not possible. So in order to test this on x86 gdc needs to be built from source and

[Issue 13033] New: std.conv.toBase too

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13033 Issue ID: 13033 Summary: std.conv.toBase too Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Comp

[Issue 13013] Failed unittests in std.json - does not parse doubles correctly

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13013 Mark Isaacson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 13034] New: [GIT HEAD] core.stdc.stdio - deprecation warning with dmd -inline

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13034 Issue ID: 13034 Summary: [GIT HEAD] core.stdc.stdio - deprecation warning with dmd -inline Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: Windows Status: NE

[Issue 13034] [GIT HEAD] core.stdc.stdio - deprecation warning with dmd -inline

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13034 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #

[Issue 12913] Mistake concerning DLists

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 sigod changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 12913] Mistake concerning DLists

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 sigod changed: What|Removed |Added Component|DMD |Phobos Hardware|x86_64

[Issue 12913] Mistake concerning DLists

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --

[Issue 12913] Mistake concerning DLists

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 --- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com --- If you need to have a specific stack/queue, you should really be using the insertFront/insertBack and removeFront/removeBack functions. "insert" and "removeAny" are meant as "implementation defined", and

[Issue 8905] DList.Range: Internal error, inconsistent state

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8905 safety0ff.bugz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 13034] [GIT HEAD] core.stdc.stdio - deprecation warning with dmd -inline

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13034 Ivan Kazmenko changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh

[Issue 12859] Read-modify-write operation for shared variable in Phobos

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12859 Ivan Kazmenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ga...@mail.ru See Also|

[Issue 12462] std.bitmanip.BitArray should use new-style operator overloads

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12462 safety0ff.bugz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||safety0ff.b...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 fro

[Issue 12462] std.bitmanip.BitArray should use new-style operator overloads

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12462 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- (In reply to safety0ff.bugz from comment #2) > The discussion [2] seemed to conclude that we should not change the > operators for the sake of changing them. I don't agree. I think the old style operato

[Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2834 Benoit Rostykus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benoit.rosty...@adroll.com --- Comment #12

[Issue 13035] New: Cherry-picks for v2.066.0-b2

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035 Issue ID: 13035 Summary: Cherry-picks for v2.066.0-b2 Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1

[Issue 13036] New: Cherry-picks for v2.065.1-b1

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Issue ID: 13036 Summary: Cherry-picks for v2.065.1-b1 Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1

[Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2834 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #13 from J

[Issue 8859] Solaris port of the toolchain

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8859 Jason King changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||13037 --

[Issue 13037] New: SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX aren't correctly defined on Solaris

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13037 Issue ID: 13037 Summary: SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX aren't correctly defined on Solaris Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Solaris Status: NEW

[Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2834 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan M Davis --- (In reply to Benoit Rostykus from comment #12) > AdRoll (the company I work for) just put a $1000 bounty on this bug: That's quite the bounty. --

[Issue 13035] Cherry-picks for v2.066.0-b2

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035 David Nadlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@klickverbot.at --- Comment #1 from Da

[Issue 13035] Cherry-picks for v2.066.0-b2

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Edwards --- If a fix cannot be identified 48 hours prior to going live, it should be removed. --

[Issue 13038] New: Calling to!String in the destructor

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13038 Issue ID: 13038 Summary: Calling to!String in the destructor Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priori

[Issue 13038] Calling to!String in the destructor

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13038 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|