https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13196
--- Comment #7 from Manu ---
(In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #6)
> (In reply to Manu from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #4)
> > > Regardless, we can potentially make it so that the compiler is able to
> > > in
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3918
--- Comment #6 from yebblies ---
Whoops, I gave the branch the wrong number. This issue is unchanged.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13196
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis ---
(In reply to Manu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #4)
> > Regardless, we can potentially make it so that the compiler is able to infer
> > the constructor's template arguments for
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13178
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13196
--- Comment #5 from Manu ---
(In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #4)
> Regardless, we can potentially make it so that the compiler is able to infer
> the constructor's template arguments for templated types in some basic
> cases, but I think t
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12820
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3918
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/031c94f25a0a25125730e4033a3e19e8b20bc861
Merge pull request #3811 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12820
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/292828b19a8ad42a48794292db2646cff6536089
Fix Issue 12820 - DMD can inl
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12820
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
Version|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan M Davis ---
Okay. Clearly, I was not paying enough attention to what was going on here. It
always has been the case that opEquals is generated for for structs, if you
don't define it. That hasn't changed for 2.066. Rathe
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13202
Issue ID: 13202
Summary: Don't allow silent shadowing of type properties
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pri
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7597
davi...@fb.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davi...@fb.com
--- Comment #2 from davi...@fb
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/1c85734dad8e5704105c37603a694bac34925095
Fix Issue 13023 - optimizer
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/1fced8b109eb74b03adc232ca6057c2235505049
Fix Issue 13023 - optimizer
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12164
--- Comment #12 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/56ed061f012cda411fdc2fcfea4d71ba906e4a2d
Fix Issue 12164 - Function
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12164
--- Comment #11 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/44b9d2735e58833115fcf4fb7f3cc4ba524e9159
Fix Issue 12164 - Function
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13196
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #4 from J
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13172
jyx...@mailinator.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jyx...@mailinator.com
--- Comment #3
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13130
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Thaut ---
I did actually read about this syntax on the newsgroup. I don't remember where,
but after I read about it I tried it out and it works flawlessly. And it is so
much shorter to write and looks a lot nicer in then
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7599
--- Comment #5 from yebblies ---
Awesome!
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7599
Magnus Lie Hetland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13201
Issue ID: 13201
Summary: Wrong "Warning: statement is not reachable" error with
-w
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12820
--- Comment #3 from yebblies ---
(In reply to Orvid King from comment #1)
> I believe that the issue here is not that DMD inlines alloca (which it
> should)
> but instead that it fails to recognize that the memory allocated by alloca
> should be re
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12820
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13196
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6725
--- Comment #37 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #31)
> Okay. I was going to say that allowing stuff like seconds(.033) would
> encourage a lack of precision even in cases where precision was required,
> and I r
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ntrel-pub...@yahoo.co.uk
--- Comment #1 fro
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12241
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2682
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Hardware|x86
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13200
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Frijters ---
I got this error in my actual code before, but I now noticed that the line
number is different:
dmd: traits.c:481: Expression* semanticTraits(TraitsExp*, Scope*): Assertion
`protName' failed.
If needed I can
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13200
Issue ID: 13200
Summary: Assertion `protName' failed
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13200
Stefan Frijters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5908
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
Assignee|nob...@puremagic.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5908
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|EH, safe|
CC||y
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7599
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from yebblies -
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9600
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|DMD |druntime
--- Comment #3 from yebblies ---
Also, t
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9600
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
CC||y
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@puremagic.com|yebbl...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13199
Issue ID: 13199
Summary: const std.container.SList iteration
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Seve
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13175
Dicebot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13190
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/9135f17a8e91b4ff2a600380155529a855a8ce83
Fix Issue 13190 - Optimizer
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13190
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e73d4ddd25a776106b1dd21ab330787cf7cc13c2
Fix Issue 13190 - Optimizer
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13190
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10492
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
--- Comment #2 from yebblies ---
When using
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13190
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@puremagic.com|yebbl...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
Assignee|nob...@puremagic.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13198
Issue ID: 13198
Summary: Removing breakpoint in template with many instances
doesn't remove breakpoint
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Windows
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
--- Comment #10 from yebblies ---
And the same thing for short (I think)
import core.sys.windows.windows;
import core.stdc.string;
extern(C) int printf(in char*, ...);
alias T = short;
void fun(T c, T b, int v)
{
printf("%d %d\n", b);
}
voi
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
--- Comment #9 from yebblies ---
Windows test case:
import core.sys.windows.windows;
import core.stdc.string;
extern(C) int printf(in char*, ...);
alias T = byte;
void fun(T c, T b, T a)
{
printf("%d %d %d\n", a, b, c);
}
void abc(T[] b, si
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6725
--- Comment #36 from Sobirari Muhomori ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #34)
> (In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #32)
> > It's meaningful to sleep for 200ms, but not for 0.2s. When you need a better
> > precision, you switch
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13197
Issue ID: 13197
Summary: 'package' visibility bug
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Comp
52 matches
Mail list logo
