https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14453
drug007 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drug2...@bk.ru
--- Comment #1 from drug007 ---
dm
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13920
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/c8173f3a87a14312f734f584af80fa686b4333f3
fix Issue 13920 - DMD crash
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14453
Issue ID: 14453
Summary: segfault in release mode
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
--- Comment #3 from yebblies ---
(In reply to Tomer Filiba from comment #2)
> couldn't inner-scopes be rewritten like that, only making sure the lambda is
> fully-scoped so that external variables will be heap-allocated
That is automatic outlining,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10943
Justin Whear changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jus...@economicmodeling.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14452
Martin Krejcirik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@krej.cz
Summary|Floating
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14452
Răzvan Ștefănescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Răzvan Șt
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14452
Issue ID: 14452
Summary: Floating point invalid operation when returning a
structure containing a float field
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Wi
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340
Ivan Kazmenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from Ivan Kazmenko ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
--- Comment #2 from Tomer Filiba ---
you are correct:
===
void foo() {
{
ulong[32] x;
writeln(x.ptr);
}
{
ulong[32] x;
writeln(x.ptr);
}
{
ulong[32] x;
writeln(x.ptr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Hardware|x86_64
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14436
--- Comment #6 from yebblies ---
Ok, I'll have a look. This can probably be special-cased, although there is a
long-standing problem that the optimizer doesn't look at constant data
correctly.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
Tomer Filiba changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomerfil...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
Issue ID: 14451
Summary: static-foreach uses huge stack for no reason
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Pr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5329
Robert Schadek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14436
--- Comment #5 from Marc Schütz ---
(In reply to yebblies from comment #4)
> By empty array do you mean empty array literal?
>
> eg assert(x != []);
Yes, it should read "empty array [literal] or string literal".
In fact, the code generated for `in
16 matches
Mail list logo