[Issue 14549] isVirtualMethod does not work well with Github DMD

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14549 --- Comment #2 from Puneet Goel pun...@coverify.org --- (In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #1) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4635 Sorry for checking this late. This PR causes another regression for me. I will file it in a

[Issue 14571] New: Large static arraus seem to lock up DMD

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14571 Issue ID: 14571 Summary: Large static arraus seem to lock up DMD Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 5227] X ^^ FP at compile-time

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5227 --- Comment #12 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #11) (In reply to Manu from comment #10) (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #8) (In reply to Manu from comment #7) log() works! I doubt that,

[Issue 14565] dmd -profile produces garbled output for long-running CPU-intensive processes

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14565 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/6ce3287415567e2c63eca8bb73b7252a5c4f4d1c fix Issue 14565 -

[Issue 14573] New: Extreme memory usage when `synchronized( object )` is used

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14573 Issue ID: 14573 Summary: Extreme memory usage when `synchronized( object )` is used Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 5227] X ^^ FP at compile-time

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5227 --- Comment #11 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org --- (In reply to Manu from comment #10) (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #8) (In reply to Manu from comment #7) log() works! I doubt that, CTFE isn't powerful enough yet.

[Issue 14571] Large static arraus seem to lock up DMD

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14571 --- Comment #2 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com --- More amazing that a quadratic increase in compile time as a result of linear increase in array size, is that script you just produced... that is truly astonishing! Seriously, I'm speechless. O_O --

[Issue 14572] New: cannot build dmd from source anymore: 'g++ -m64: No such file or directory'

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14572 Issue ID: 14572 Summary: cannot build dmd from source anymore: 'g++ -m64: No such file or directory' Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X

[Issue 14571] Large static arraus seem to lock up DMD

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14571 ag0ae...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||performance CC|

[Issue 12289] incorrect core.stdc.stdio.fpos_t alias

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12289 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/b96aa6962ac477bf711f7bedc4cc326534025ce2 Fix Issue 12289 -

[Issue 14549] isVirtualMethod does not work well with Github DMD

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14549 --- Comment #3 from Puneet Goel pun...@coverify.org --- Reduced code. With the PR applied, I get dmd assertion failure: $ dmd /tmp/test.d dmd: attrib.c:1219: virtual Dsymbols* StaticIfDeclaration::include(Scope*, ScopeDsymbol*): Assertion `scope'

[Issue 14574] New: revert attributes

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14574 Issue ID: 14574 Summary: revert attributes Product: D Version: future Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1

[Issue 6045] Unable to demangle symbols

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6045 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org

[Issue 14576] [ddemangle] core.demangle unable to handle ambiguity in symbols

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14576 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||spec --

[Issue 6045] Unable to demangle symbols

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6045 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||14576 --- Comment #8

[Issue 14576] [ddemangle] core.demangle unable to handle ambiguity in symbols

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14576 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||6045 --

[Issue 14547] Ddoc should prefer new Variable Template syntax

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14547 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 14547] Ddoc should prefer new Variable Template syntax

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14547 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/4adaa202f70c237bd4678fc1e8dc09d4c7ace229 fix Issue 14547 - Ddoc

[Issue 14561] Large enums cannot be parsed due to too many recursive template expansions

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14561 --- Comment #3 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com --- Implemented changes discussed here, in pull 3275: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3275 --

[Issue 14524] Right clicking in solution explorer to add folders does not work as expected

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14524 --- Comment #2 from Philip Daniels philip.daniels1...@gmail.com --- OK I understand and respect your decision, but you may want to think about changing it to work the way it does for C#/VB: I would estimate that C#/VB users of Visual Studio outnumber

[Issue 14576] New: [ddemangle] core.demangle unable to handle ambiguity in symbols

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14576 Issue ID: 14576 Summary: [ddemangle] core.demangle unable to handle ambiguity in symbols Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[Issue 14576] [ddemangle] core.demangle unable to handle ambiguity in symbols

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14576 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org

[Issue 3043] Template symbol arg cannot be demangled

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||14576 --

[Issue 14577] New: Add dustmite tool to VisualD

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14577 Issue ID: 14577 Summary: Add dustmite tool to VisualD Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority:

[Issue 14575] New: compile error with std.range.refRange when front/back isn't implicitly convertible from const to mutable

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14575 Issue ID: 14575 Summary: compile error with std.range.refRange when front/back isn't implicitly convertible from const to mutable Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All

[Issue 14575] compile error with std.range.refRange when front/back isn't implicitly convertible from const to mutable

2015-05-11 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14575 ag0ae...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from