https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14413
--- Comment #7 from Nick Sabalausky ---
Pull Request: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4745
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
Sum
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14413
--- Comment #6 from Nick Sabalausky ---
This is happening in function "Lexer::combineComments" in "lexer.c". The
function combines consecutive doc comments, like:
/++ comment 1 +/
/++
comment 2
+/
/** comment 3 */
/** comment 4 */
/// comment 5
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9776
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #4)
> Wrong, the Windows console still treats \n as "line feed without carriage
> return".
I just tested and it seems I misremembered, sorry. But it's still a bre
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9776
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9776
--- Comment #3 from Nick Sabalausky ---
Another way of putting it. Do this on a Windows machine:
---
> type test.d
import std.file, std.stdio;
void main() {
auto str = cast(string) std.file.read("input.txt");
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13758
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/commit/7b655a13ce020232b625fabaaea5918fad18fcc2
fix Issue 13758 - RDMD r
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13758
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14259
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/commit/3ff5be6ee514d7a5239d1854cc58db22e3623ee3
fix Issue 14259 - rdmd:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7044
--- Comment #48 from Leandro Lucarella ---
(In reply to Walter Bright from comment #44)
> > How is this then different from just specifying a whole new config file?
>
> Because multiple sections can be selected, rather than having a separate
> config
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14696
--- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #1)
> the same bug on HEAD without an alias:
>
> //alias get this;
> ...
> foo(args.length ? makes().get : null);
And the obvious smacks me in the face :) Than
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara ---
https:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14578
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
--- Comment #7 from Ketmar Dark ---
thanks. i don't know anything about glue code and backend, so i did it the
least intrusive way i can. your fix is definitely better.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
Severity|enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #5)
> or a patch for those who prefers `ubyte[0]` to be valid (phobos using such
> thing, hehe):
[snip]
When tsa->size() == 0, toDtElem can return a dummy zero as the dt.
diff
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13720
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara ---
Strip off dependencies to phobos/druntime.
struct FracSec
{
this(int hnsecs) {}
}
struct SysTime
{
this(TimeOfDay dateTime, FracSec fracSec) { }
}
struct TimeOfDay
{
~this() { }
}
void assertThrown(T
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14693
--- Comment #3 from Ketmar Dark ---
for voldemorts compiler can put `auto` there. yet this will require running
semantic stage, which has it's complications (semantic stage mutilates ASTs).
the other solution is to simply emit the body for functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14578
--- Comment #13 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #12)
> I created 3 test cases, one based on your recommendation, one based on Ali's
> in issue 14005, and one based on the post in
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/yfuxv
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14692
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
(In reply to Rory from comment #3)
> Perhaps it is, how could I check that?
Try D from git master.
> Why would the code work fine in GDC then?
Why wouldn't (or would) it?
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14692
--- Comment #3 from Rory ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #2)
> Issue 9279 ?
Perhaps it is, how could I check that? Why would the code work fine in GDC
then?
--
21 matches
Mail list logo
