https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
Issue ID: 15460
Summary: Ddoc: merge the opening comment "" into the default definition
of DDOC
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: N
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
Adam D. Ruppe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||destructiona...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 fro
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Adam D. Ruppe from comment #1)
> This is the code that does it:
>
> buf.printf("$(DDOC_COMMENT Generated by Ddoc from %s)\n", m.srcfile.
> toChars());
>
>
> You could just define `DDOC_C
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #3 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
$ make -f posix.mak
make -C src -f posix.mak
no cpu specified, assuming X86
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/me/d/pull-request-stuff/dmd/src'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `lexer.h', needed by `s2ir.o'.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #4 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
well looks like i had to make clean because I had stuff left over from when it
was still C++ for last time I did a ddoc PR.
But still, ugh.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Adam D. Ruppe from comment #4)
> well looks like i had to make clean because I had stuff left over from when
> it was still C++ for last time I did a ddoc PR.
>
> But still, ugh.
I guess it's
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #6 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/5313
BTW for anyone reading this, the ddoc generator is actually pretty simple code.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
Sönke Ludwig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slud...@outerproduct.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15459
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Hardware|x86_64
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15459
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Zom
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #7 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
The auto tester cares about the exact bytes ddoc puts out?!?! Looks like it is
failing because there's a space... but I didn't change the spaces... must be
the change of new lines. This is ridiculous. Spaces don'
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #9 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #8)
> (In reply to Adam D. Ruppe from comment #7)
> > [trim pointless rant]
>
> Some of the tests are only there to make sure the output doesn't change by
> acc
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #10 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
Please document the test system and link it from here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor
This change was not intentional btw, I don't understand why the test ever
passed since the spaces it was c
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15461
Issue ID: 15461
Summary: std.stdio.File ctor that accepts `FILE*` should not be
hidden
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15461
Ketmar Dark changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #11 fro
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
Ali Cehreli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acehr...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #12 from Ali Ce
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
(In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Adam D. Ruppe from comment #1)
> > This is the code that does it:
> >
> > buf.printf("$(DDOC_COMMENT Generated by Ddoc from %s)\n", m.sr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #14 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
Ali, the comment is still there, just moved a couple lines down, defined in the
DDOC macro instead of above it. So if you want it you still have it.
BTW there's also a $(SRCFILE) macro you can use in your own c
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15460
--- Comment #15 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
Walter:
"I suppose that other web frameworks don't have this problem because they don't
check the output."
You check the output by looking for the relevant piece(s) for your test, not by
considering any changed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15459
--- Comment #2 from Simon Na. ---
Thanks for the thorough explanation!
--
22 matches
Mail list logo