[Issue 6528] Private module functions optimizations

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6528 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannesp...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Jo

[Issue 17250] ProcessPipes (std.process) should provide a test for a null pid

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17250 Jon Degenhardt changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #1 from Jon Degenhardt ---

[Issue 17250] ProcessPipes (std.process) should provide a test for a null pid

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17250 Jon Degenhardt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ProcessPipes (std.process) |ProcessPipes (std.process)

[Issue 17250] New: ProcessPipes (std.process) should provide a test for a null pid struct

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17250 Issue ID: 17250 Summary: ProcessPipes (std.process) should provide a test for a null pid struct Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X Stat

[Issue 17249] New: Make BigInt data visible (not modifiable!)

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17249 Issue ID: 17249 Summary: Make BigInt data visible (not modifiable!) Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Pri

[Issue 17157] ctRegex.matchAll doesn't set last item in Captures

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17157 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Issue 17157] ctRegex.matchAll doesn't set last item in Captures

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17157 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/0e76847361ef8005f080f2cd57a111f563dc97a9 Fix issue 17157 ctRegex.matchAll doesn't set last item i

[Issue 8065] No way to write function/delegate literals returning ref T

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8065 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from b2.t...@gmx.

[Issue 16521] Wrong code generation with switch + static foreach

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16521 --- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer --- guys, the static foreach comment was a *wish* for this, not a recommendation to use some already existing thing. It would be nice to do: static foreach(idx; 0 .. args.length) Instead of the goofy "unuse

[Issue 16521] Wrong code generation with switch + static foreach

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16521 --- Comment #7 from Nemanja Boric <4bur...@gmail.com> --- I'm not sure who ever got convinced by this code that `static foreach` works. This is just very helpful and clear approach, and it should grant `static foreach` becoming a real thing, because i

[Issue 16521] Wrong code generation with switch + static foreach

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16521 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Koch --- Just because something is used in phobos does not it is correct. this code is highly dubious because it goats people into believing that tuple foreach actually works. The right way to do this is to build a string

[Issue 16521] Wrong code generation with switch + static foreach

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16521 Nemanja Boric <4bur...@gmail.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid | --- Comment #5 from Nema

[Issue 16521] Wrong code generation with switch + static foreach

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16521 Stefan Koch changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid CC|

[Issue 16521] Wrong code generation with switch + static foreach

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16521 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment #3 fr

[Issue 11038] static has no effect as a block attribute for imports

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11038 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com Severity|normal

[Issue 10997] Tupple parsing(?)

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10997 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 8065] No way to write function/delegate literals returning ref T

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8065 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com --

[Issue 17248] New: Multiple wrong function definitions in core.sys.windows.winldap (causing runtime issues)

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17248 Issue ID: 17248 Summary: Multiple wrong function definitions in core.sys.windows.winldap (causing runtime issues) Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: Windows

[Issue 16083] AliasSeq loses type of enums that have the same value

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Issue 16083] AliasSeq loses type of enums that have the same value

2017-03-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/71c5839088a6f7f5520b4df7d4cbb5ef94ae58d3 Fix issue 16083 - AliasSeq loses type of enums that have the s