https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16302
Yuxuan Shui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yshu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Yuxuan S
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17361
--- Comment #5 from steven kladitis ---
The latest build and like magic DMD is running again!
Version 1703
OS BUILD 16193.1001
A few other programs that stopped are working again also.
Thanks,
Steven
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16302
--- Comment #5 from Walter Bright ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #4)
> I really would like to see this, and it's pretty straightforward how it
> would look, so I will write a DIP to see if there is interest.
Great!
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16301
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||CTFE
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16301
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright ---
The following simpler code reproduces the problem:
struct OpApply {
void opApply(void delegate() dlg) {
dlg();
}
}
struct Foo {
int i;
int abc() {
auto o = O
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16301
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright ---
(In reply to ag0aep6g from comment #2)
> I think you're mistaken.
You're right. It is a CTFE problem.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16302
--- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
I really would like to see this, and it's pretty straightforward how it would
look, so I will write a DIP to see if there is interest.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17289
Zach the Mystic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reachz...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Za
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16301
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197
--- Comment #14 from Walter Bright ---
(In reply to Eyal from comment #13)
> So the bug can be closed as fixed afaic.
Thanks! But I still think you'll like the PR I made for this, as it improves
performance.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16302
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16301
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197
--- Comment #13 from Eyal ---
The dmd output was correct (ignoring irrelevant POSTBLIT -1) - w.r.t number of
ctors/postblits & dtors.
The ldc output is now correct in version:
LDC - the LLVM D compiler (1.1.0git-3139c87):
based on DMD v2.071.2 and
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17156
--- Comment #2 from Eyal ---
I see, but this would not be a problem if function was automatically
convertible to delegate (std.functional : toDelegate).
Is there any reason that you cannot hand over functions when delegates are
expected?
I'd expect
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17138
--- Comment #2 from Eyal ---
struct Object {
auto acquired() {
struct Acquired {
Object obj;
this(Object* obj) { this.obj = obj; obj.acquire(); }
~this() { obj.release(); }
}
return Acquired(&this);
}
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17394
--- Comment #1 from greensunn...@gmail.com ---
PR: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5386
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17395
Issue ID: 17395
Summary: std.file.rmdirRecurse isn't @safe
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17394
Issue ID: 17394
Summary: std.file.mkdirRecurse isn't @safe
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|enhancement
--- Comment #12 from Walter Brig
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197
--- Comment #11 from Walter Bright ---
Another effect you are seeing is default construction, which should account for
more destructors and postblits than constructor calls.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197
David Nadlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |critical
--- Comment #10 from David Nadlin
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
Severity|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17393
Issue ID: 17393
Summary: AllocatorList leaks memory in "ouroboros mode"
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17392
Issue ID: 17392
Summary: Add Dub file for the lexer and parser
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17387
--- Comment #2 from Nick Treleaven ---
Yes, thanks. What I was confused by was actually when the struct is defined
inside the unittest with the static keyword - pure is not inferred. Non-static
nested struct inference works, it seemed weird that addi
25 matches
Mail list logo
