[Issue 13589] [git-head] Asm statement could be assumed to nothrow, safe, pure by the enclosing function attribute

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13589 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||iasm CC|

[Issue 17021] Invalid code generated for out parameters in naked asm functions

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17021 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||iasm CC|

[Issue 16964] Wrong label alignment in asm statement

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16964 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||iasm CC|

[Issue 19528] asm ptoblem

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19528 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||iasm CC|

[Issue 9738] inline asm offset expression looks like array indexing

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9738 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||iasm CC|

[Issue 16274] The curses of debugging: short argument passed in 16-bit register, against ABI

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16274 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #5 from Dlang Bot --- @WalterB

[Issue 19729] Constructor overloads coming from mixin are not resolved

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19729 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #3 from Dlang Bot --- @NilsLan

[Issue 15242] Allow version or static if blocks in asm blocks

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15242 --- Comment #1 from ponce --- FWIW I think this can be closed, I've needed this in the past but since `intel-intrinsics` the amount of assembly code I maintain has reduced (but wasn't totally eliminated). --

[Issue 21210] New: std.traits : isAssignable false positive on disabled copy struct

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21210 Issue ID: 21210 Summary: std.traits : isAssignable false positive on disabled copy struct Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[Issue 21208] [ICE] dtoh with enums

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21208 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 21210] std.traits : isAssignable false positive on disabled copy struct

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21210 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Dlang Bot --- @Geod24

[Issue 15242] Allow version or static if blocks in asm blocks

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15242 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com --- Comment #2 from Basile-z ---

[Issue 21211] New: `__FILE__.ptr` as default argument gives wrong value

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21211 Issue ID: 21211 Summary: `__FILE__.ptr` as default argument gives wrong value Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 21211] `__FILE__.ptr` as default argument gives wrong value

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21211 --- Comment #1 from Mathias LANG --- Side note: `__FUNCTION__` and `__PRETTY_FUNCTION__` work correctly. --

[Issue 21210] std.traits : isAssignable false positive on disabled copy struct

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21210 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 11646] [snn] `malloc` is unstable for large allocations

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11646 --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright --- The malloc code in snn.lib is: void *malloc (size_t m_size) { /* The +2 is because there's a buffer overflow somewhere in stlport. * It is triggered by stltutorial\ex13-01.cpp */ return Hea

[Issue 11646] [snn] `malloc` is unstable for large allocations

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11646 --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright --- Fixed: https://github.com/DigitalMars/dmc/commit/1ba0e41c66d8c7a266b55e5b7b19ed9476ca7726 --

[Issue 11646] [snn] `malloc` is unstable for large allocations

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11646 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 21212] New: [DIP1000] taking `ref` parameter address check leaking when dip1000 is enabled

2020-08-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21212 Issue ID: 21212 Summary: [DIP1000] taking `ref` parameter address check leaking when dip1000 is enabled Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Mac OS X