https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21349
--- Comment #6 from Илья Ярошенко ---
I have thought think about these lines
> For backward compatibility reasons, a struct that defines both a copy
> constructor and a postblit will only use the postblit for implicit copying.
What they are really
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21349
--- Comment #5 from Paul Backus ---
When an aggregate has both old and new style members, the compiler generates
both a copy constructor and a postblit, and the postblit takes precedence.
I agree that this is a bug in the language design: the genera
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21349
Илья Ярошенко changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |blocker
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21349
--- Comment #4 from Илья Ярошенко ---
btw, I don't see whare spec says that an aggregate can't hold both old and new
style members
struct C
{
SOld sOld;
SNew sNew;
}
void main()
{
C c;
auto d = c;
assert(d.sOld.s);
assert(d.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21349
--- Comment #3 from Илья Ярошенко ---
well. The language spec is buggy.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21349
Paul Backus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||snarwin+bugzi...@gmail.com
Severity|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21350
Issue ID: 21350
Summary: [TestSuite] Failure of test/unit/frontend.d shows as
"TARGET: ."
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21349
--- Comment #1 from Илья Ярошенко ---
The last assert fails
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21349
Issue ID: 21349
Summary: copy and postblit constructors aren't compatible
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
P
