https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21878
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21876
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21878
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot ---
@BorisCa
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
--- Comment #2 from Blatnik ---
I also don't understand why the error message I get from that is different from
other useless statements. For example:
1 + 1; // Error: `1 + 1` has no effect
int[1] i = [1];
i[] + i[]; // Error: array operation `i[]
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
Blatnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Array operation fails to|Array operation fails to
|compil
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
Issue ID: 21881
Summary: Array operation fails to compile even though it really
shouldn'
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21880
Issue ID: 21880
Summary: [REG 2.095] scope variable assigned to non-scope
parameter calling function
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Stat
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21879
Issue ID: 21879
Summary: -betterC "undefined reference to '_memset32'"
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18466
Berni44 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@bernis-buecher.de
--- Comment #1 from Ber
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21808
--- Comment #4 from Bolpat ---
(In reply to Berni44 from comment #2)
> Changing this to "enhancement", because normal use of positional parameters
> has a completely different meaning - it gives the position of an argument in
> the function call and
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21878
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
I should add that `inout` is also somehow to blame. Works fine without it.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21878
Issue ID: 21878
Summary: "ref" lost when indexing array in CTFE
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: CTFE
Severity: norm
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21808
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #3 from Dlang Bot ---
@berni44
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21808
Berni44 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Position format specifiers |std.format: It should be
|don't
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21876
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot ---
@BorisCa
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21875
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #2 from Basile-z ---
i suggest a '--nogdb' option in the time being. Most CI services will still use
the LTS ubuntu with GDB 9 for a while tho.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21877
Issue ID: 21877
Summary: VS2019 crash with "Show parameter storage class at
call site"
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
LucienPe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucien.perreg...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Lu
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21876
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
Compiler output:
test.d(4,9): Error: variable `a` cannot be read at compile time
test.d(7,14):called from here: `test()`
It seems to have worked in 2.053? But not in 2.052 nor any version after it.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21876
Issue ID: 21876
Summary: Zero-length static arrays "cannot be read at compile
time"
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
21 matches
Mail list logo