[Issue 21878] "ref" lost when indexing array in CTFE

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21878 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 21876] Zero-length static arrays "cannot be read at compile time"

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21876 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 21878] "ref" lost when indexing array in CTFE

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21878 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- @BorisCa

[Issue 21881] Array operation fails to compile even though it really should

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21881 --- Comment #2 from Blatnik --- I also don't understand why the error message I get from that is different from other useless statements. For example: 1 + 1; // Error: `1 + 1` has no effect int[1] i = [1]; i[] + i[]; // Error: array operation `i[]

[Issue 21881] Array operation fails to compile even though it really should

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21881 Blatnik changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Array operation fails to|Array operation fails to |compil

[Issue 21881] New: Array operation fails to compile even though it really shouldn'

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21881 Issue ID: 21881 Summary: Array operation fails to compile even though it really shouldn' Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[Issue 21880] New: [REG 2.095] scope variable assigned to non-scope parameter calling function

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21880 Issue ID: 21880 Summary: [REG 2.095] scope variable assigned to non-scope parameter calling function Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Stat

[Issue 21879] New: -betterC "undefined reference to '_memset32'"

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21879 Issue ID: 21879 Summary: -betterC "undefined reference to '_memset32'" Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regression

[Issue 18466] std.format: Wide / Full-width characters as defined by Unicode TR11 (EastAsianWidth.txt) should occupy 2 spaces per character

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18466 Berni44 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@bernis-buecher.de --- Comment #1 from Ber

[Issue 21808] std.format: It should be possible to change the order of key and value of AAs.

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21808 --- Comment #4 from Bolpat --- (In reply to Berni44 from comment #2) > Changing this to "enhancement", because normal use of positional parameters > has a completely different meaning - it gives the position of an argument in > the function call and

[Issue 21878] "ref" lost when indexing array in CTFE

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21878 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev --- I should add that `inout` is also somehow to blame. Works fine without it. --

[Issue 21878] New: "ref" lost when indexing array in CTFE

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21878 Issue ID: 21878 Summary: "ref" lost when indexing array in CTFE Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Keywords: CTFE Severity: norm

[Issue 21808] std.format: It should be possible to change the order of key and value of AAs.

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21808 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #3 from Dlang Bot --- @berni44

[Issue 21808] std.format: It should be possible to change the order of key and value of AAs.

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21808 Berni44 changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Position format specifiers |std.format: It should be |don't

[Issue 21876] Zero-length static arrays "cannot be read at compile time"

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21876 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- @BorisCa

[Issue 21875] std.format: wrong number of format specifiers in nested format string of associative arrays should be detected

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21875 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 21874] The test suite fails with most recent GDB versions

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21874 --- Comment #2 from Basile-z --- i suggest a '--nogdb' option in the time being. Most CI services will still use the LTS ubuntu with GDB 9 for a while tho. --

[Issue 21877] New: VS2019 crash with "Show parameter storage class at call site"

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21877 Issue ID: 21877 Summary: VS2019 crash with "Show parameter storage class at call site" Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 21874] The test suite fails with most recent GDB versions

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21874 LucienPe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucien.perreg...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Lu

[Issue 21876] Zero-length static arrays "cannot be read at compile time"

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21876 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev --- Compiler output: test.d(4,9): Error: variable `a` cannot be read at compile time test.d(7,14):called from here: `test()` It seems to have worked in 2.053? But not in 2.052 nor any version after it.

[Issue 21876] New: Zero-length static arrays "cannot be read at compile time"

2021-04-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21876 Issue ID: 21876 Summary: Zero-length static arrays "cannot be read at compile time" Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW