[Issue 22114] New: Fatal Token Parser Error at Line 914 for Version 2.097.0

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22114 Issue ID: 22114 Summary: Fatal Token Parser Error at Line 914 for Version 2.097.0 Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 22114] Fatal Token Parser Error at Line 914 for Version 2.097.0

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22114 --- Comment #1 from ty...@linuxdev.app --- In reference to Token Error, I am referring to this: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/c436df7580be08481386e13da41c08e91f46b07f/src/dmd/tokens.d#L914 --

[Issue 22114] Fatal Token Parser Error at Line 914 for Version 2.097.0

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22114 --- Comment #2 from moonlightsenti...@disroot.org --- Not a parser error, the trace output suggests an error in the backend. But the code fails with current master in the CTFE engine: [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthrea

[Issue 22114] Fatal Token Parser Error at Line 914 for Version 2.097.0

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22114 --- Comment #3 from ty...@linuxdev.app --- (In reply to moonlightsentinel from comment #2) > Not a parser error, the trace output suggests an error in the backend. > > But the code fails with current master in the CTFE engine: Alright, prior to redu

[Issue 22114] Fatal Token Parser Error at Line 914 for Version 2.097.0

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22114 moonlightsenti...@disroot.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||moonlightsentinel@disroot.o

[Issue 22114] Fatal Token Parser Error at Line 914 for Version 2.097.0

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22114 --- Comment #4 from moonlightsenti...@disroot.org --- (In reply to Tyler from comment #3) > Alright, prior to reducing the code to minimal reproducible code, I got this > error which led me to thinking to a conclusion that it's a parser error: > > co

[Issue 22114] Fatal Token Parser Error at Line 914 for Version 2.097.0

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22114 --- Comment #5 from ty...@linuxdev.app --- (In reply to moonlightsentinel from comment #4) > (In reply to Tyler from comment #3) > > Alright, prior to reducing the code to minimal reproducible code, I got this > > error which led me to thinking to a c

[Issue 22045] Assignment of pointers in union should be @safe, only pointers access are @system

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22045 --- Comment #2 from Luís Ferreira --- > I don't really see the point in special casing union pointer assignment > when > you cannot access them. You should be able to safely assign a pointer in a function and never access it and accessing it elsewhe

[Issue 20457] Asserts must not be turned off in release builds of dmd

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20457 Dennis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16647] package.di is not recognized

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16647 Dennis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 17629] package.di files cannot be used

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17629 Dennis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||temta...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Dennis ---

[Issue 7386] Can't use a 'version' that was set inside 'static if'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7386 Dennis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dkor...@live.nl --- Comment #2 from Dennis --- > Th

[Issue 14064] Error message about @ attributes incomplete.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14064 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- @dkorpel