[Issue 22518] [dip1000] return without scope/ref not specified

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22518 --- Comment #4 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/dlang.org pull request #3137 "Revert "Fix Issue 22518 - return without scope/ref not specified"" was merged into master: - 7d21cad3b524f887cdcb4b4b5e4ec615d1cf069b by Razvan Nitu: Revert "Fix Issue 22518 - r

[Issue 22581] DMD not able to build itself on Solaris

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22581 --- Comment #2 from Brian Callahan --- If -lsocket and -lnsl are unconditionally required to link programs on Solaris, it might be better to place them in the DMD source code here where there are similar tweaks for both Linux and OpenBSD: https://git

[Issue 22581] DMD not able to build itself on Solaris

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22581 --- Comment #1 from jkr...@telecolumbus.net --- Sorry for double posting, but I have a small but important update: 1. I found that I had previously made some changes in druntime which might be the cause for the initial failure. 2. I pulled in the lat

[Issue 22570] more arguments than fields allowed in struct constructor

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22570 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 22582] [std.algorithm.count] predicate does not implicitly convert to bool

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22582 --- Comment #1 from Dlang Bot --- @iK4tsu created dlang/phobos pull request #8330 "Issue 22582 - [std.algorithm.count] predicate does not implicitly convert to bool" mentioning this issue: - std.algorithm.searching.count: Fix predicate not implicitl

[Issue 22582] [std.algorithm.count] predicate does not implicitly convert to bool

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22582 João Lourenço changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jlourenco5...@gmail.com --

[Issue 22582] New: [std.algorithm.count] predicate does not implicitly convert to bool

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22582 Issue ID: 22582 Summary: [std.algorithm.count] predicate does not implicitly convert to bool Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status:

[Issue 22581] DMD not able to build itself on Solaris

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22581 jkr...@telecolumbus.net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|DMD does not add necessary |DMD not able to build

[Issue 22581] DMD does not add necessary linker flags on Solaris

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22581 jkr...@telecolumbus.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bcal...@openbsd.org,

[Issue 22581] New: DMD does not add necessary linker flags on Solaris

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22581 Issue ID: 22581 Summary: DMD does not add necessary linker flags on Solaris Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 22570] more arguments than fields allowed in struct constructor

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22570 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- @RazvanN

[Issue 22518] [dip1000] return without scope/ref not specified

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22518 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 22580] New: [Arrays]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22580 Issue ID: 22580 Summary: [Arrays] Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All URL: http://dlang.org/ OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Prio

[Issue 22565] Attributes not accepted for empty declaration

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22565 --- Comment #5 from RazvanN --- (In reply to Răzvan Ștefănescu from comment #4) > UDAs can be attached to any declaration according to the grammar, not to a > symbol only. > > How useful is that, it's debatable, but there are situations where the f