https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22367
--- Comment #16 from Walter Bright ---
Better than turning on/off the ModuleInfo generation, it is better to do or not
do the triggers that cause the ModuleInfo to be generated.
For example, if a static constructor is written, and the ModuleInfo is
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22367
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|dll, pull |
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22367
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #15 from Dlang Bot ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22367
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|The __ModuleInfo member |Modules compiled with
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
Teodor Dutu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/dlang/dm
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
Issue ID: 23534
Summary: __traits(isZeroInit) is true for enums with explicit
values
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23533
Issue ID: 23533
Summary: Segmentation fault accessing enum.max with
-preview=nosharedaccess
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #7 from Dlang Bot ---
@ibuclaw created dlang/phobos pull request #8642 "std.math.hardware: Fix broken
IEEE FP flags tests" mentioning this issue:
- std.math.hardware: Fix broken IEEE FP flags tests
1. The `pragma(inline, false)`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23532
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from Dlang Bot ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23532
Issue ID: 23532
Summary: Missing type properties for complex special enum types
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23531
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from Dlang Bot ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23518
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23528
Richard Cattermole changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|regression |enhancement
--- Comment #3 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23531
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, safe
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23531
Issue ID: 23531
Summary: [DIP1000] scope variable can be assigned as AA key
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23490
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #5 from Dlang Bot ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23490
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
With the ICE, it's easier to get a further reduction/consolidation of sources.
frop.d
---
import pop;
class Mu: Pop { }
class Frop : Pop {
// final // does not fail if declared final
void frolick() {}
}
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23490
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23530
Issue ID: 23530
Summary: casting immutable away allowed in safe
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23518
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dlang-bugzilla@thecybershad
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
Saying that... the way that pragmas are handled in the front-end is all over
the shop, with no coherent way to manage them (is a pragma standalone? must
have a body? statement only? declaration only? etc...), or
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to RazvanN from comment #3)
> That is true, but in your original bug report you want to apply the pragma
> to the declarations inside the body, right? To be able to do that you need
> to create a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8115
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8122
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #4 from RazvanN ---
>
> That is true, but in your original bug report you want to apply the pragma
> to the declarations inside the body, right? To be able to do that you need
> to create a PragmaDeclaration and attach it to the the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #3 from RazvanN ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
> (In reply to RazvanN from comment #1)
> > 1. We can implement the expected behavior by attaching the pragma to the
> > declaration, but given the existing machinery in the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to RazvanN from comment #1)
> 1. We can implement the expected behavior by attaching the pragma to the
> declaration, but given the existing machinery in the compiler this will
> require a lot of rework
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23522
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bootcamp
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23528
--- Comment #2 from RazvanN ---
(In reply to RazvanN from comment #1)
> Are you sure this is a regression? What was the last version that accepted
> this code? Might be a phobos issue also.
I have tested with 2.100.2 and 2.100.1 and it still fails.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23528
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22745
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23518
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com
Component|dmd
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23516
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23529
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
35 matches
Mail list logo
