[Issue 24520] New: [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes)

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24520 Issue ID: 24520 Summary: [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes) Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Issue 24520] [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes)

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24520 --- Comment #1 from ponce --- https://d.godbolt.org/z/Wqc17Gs8P --

[Issue 24520] [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes)

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24520 ponce changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, spec Hardware|x86

[Issue 24520] [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes)

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24520 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #2 from tim

[Issue 24520] [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes)

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24520 --- Comment #3 from ponce --- I get that this is unable to create dysfunction other than "doesn't build". My issue is that a silent language change with no changelog entry and no spec change. This issue is exactly similar with introduction of named

[Issue 5573] Compiler (not linker) should generate an error for missing main()

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5573 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 23657] [REG2.101] Incorrect error escape reference to stack allocated value

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23657 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 24519] compiler segfault on single default constructor argument

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24519 Dennis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dkor...@live.nl Hardware|x86_64

[Issue 24520] [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes)

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24520 Dennis changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid | CC||dk

[Issue 24520] [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes)

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24520 --- Comment #5 from ponce --- I admit it's not entirely clear to me if the semantics of cast() are the same as implicit conversions. Haven't found a counter-example though, even with alias this. --

[Issue 24519] compiler segfault on default argument with slice operator []

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24519 Dennis changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|compiler segfault on single |compiler segfault on |default con

[Issue 24520] [REG] C-style casts are now accepted (sometimes)

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24520 --- Comment #6 from ponce --- In changelog it's in: "DMD Compiler bug fixes" section. But grammar changes are usually language changes, so it could be easier to anticipate if there was a Language Change section (which I will read, more likely that

[Issue 24519] compiler segfault on default argument with slice operator []

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24519 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #3 from Dlang Bot --- @dkorpel

[Issue 24519] compiler segfault on default argument with slice operator []

2024-04-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24519 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---