> --- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-07-28 14:49:50 PDT ---
>
> (cut)
>
> By the way, what's the point in allowing/keeping ugly and error-prone function
> literals in D2?
>
> It's better for D2 to keep/allow only _one_ standard, clean and readable
> syntax
> for functions pointers
Sorry for the bugzilla outage a little while ago. The box got way
overloaded. Should be all happy now.
On 7/9/2010 6:17 AM, d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3490
>
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from Leandro Lucarella 2010-07-09 06:14:20
> PDT ---
> (In reply to comment #3)
>> undoing false dependency
>
> Can you elaborate a little on why having bug 859 as a
Brad Roberts wrote:
> I'm going to bump bugzilla from 3.2.3 to 3.4.1 sometime tonight. It should
> only
> take a few minutes. After the update, you'll need to force refresh your
> browser
> to pick up updated .css and similar files. The update on the digitalmars c++
I'm going to bump bugzilla from 3.2.3 to 3.4.1 sometime tonight. It should only
take a few minutes. After the update, you'll need to force refresh your browser
to pick up updated .css and similar files. The update on the digitalmars c++
bugzilla instance went fast and easy, so I don't expect pro
Brad Roberts wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?action=wrap&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_id=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bugidtype=include&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&email1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?action=wrap&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_id=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bugidtype=include&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&email1=&email2=&emailassigned_to1=1&emailassigned_to2=1&emailcc2=1&emailrepo
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> Thanks for your work on what has become an invaluable resource for the
> D community. Really, you do way too much for free :)
>
> Suggestions? Actually, I was thinking of an "Order Pizza" button.
Thanks, but I do what I do because I enjoy doing it. That it's useful
Brad Roberts wrote:
> Given the increasing number of users who have been and are starting to
> contribute bug fixes.. first off, THANKS! Secondarily, I'd like to help make
> it
> easier to track what's being worked on vs what's filed but un-examined and
> un-add
Given the increasing number of users who have been and are starting to
contribute bug fixes.. first off, THANKS! Secondarily, I'd like to help make it
easier to track what's being worked on vs what's filed but un-examined and
un-addressed.
To that end, I've added a user 'No Owner' and switched al
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2952
>
> --- Comment #2 from Don 2009-05-25 03:02:40 PDT ---
> I have fixed this but can't post it to the runtime source since dsource is
> down.
In an earlier thread on one of the newsgroups, Sean expressed a prefer
Sean Kelly wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> Whooo, it's very pretty :)
>>>
>>
>> Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959
>>
>> Anyone else notice t
A while ago the inbound mail into bugzilla from replies to this group broke. I
figured out why, but the fix wasn't pleasant -- the perl code wasn't compatible
with a perl upgrade (5.8 -> 5.10). The migration I did tonight ought to make it
possible for me to put that mechanism back together.. howe
I know I need to suppress the last couple lines of bugzilla posts with the
Configure and why the mail is being received parts. How that part is generated
changed a lot between the old and new versions of bugzilla so it'll take me a
tad more work to fix that up. This part:
--
Configure is
Brad Roberts wrote:
> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a
> new
> host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm
> Seattle
> time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an
Stewart Gordon wrote:
> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move
>> it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at
>> around 10 or 11pm Seattle time.
>
>
> For those who aren&#
Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new
host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm Seattle
time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour just
to give myself some padding time.
Later,
Brad
dsimcha wrote:
> To the druntime people: Should bug reports that are clearly druntime bugs be
> filed in Bugzilla or on dsource in the druntime project?
Speaking strictly for myself.. I'd prefer the use of bugzilla and the
newsgroups so that everything is kept in once place. That leaves
dsource
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2493
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
>Severity|normal
> dmd output:
> Error: &a.foo is not an lvalue
Second bug on the same snippit of code, this error message lacks source
file and line number info. I didn't try the code to see if it's just
missing from the report or if dmd fails to include it.
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> "Brad Roberts" wrote
>> Does anyone, particularly Walter, pay any attention? I agree they're
>> useful categorizers, but I have doubts that they're even used by anyone.
>
> The problem with them (IMO) is that you have to ty
Does anyone, particularly Walter, pay any attention? I agree they're
useful categorizers, but I have doubts that they're even used by anyone.
> --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19 18:10 ---
> Please remember to assign keywords to bug reports. To everybody reading this:
> Pl
22 matches
Mail list logo
