or more.
Currently CTFE is not fit for heavy computations.
Bye,
bearophile
,
bearophile
Jonathan M Davis:
You posted to the wrong list.
- Jonathan M Davis
Right Jonathan, I am sorry :-) I will try again in the main D
newsgroup.
Bye,
bearophile
Raphael Basso:
I'm having serious problems with Access Violation to create
programs that make use of C DLLs in DMD 2060. After all,
integration with DLLs in C DMD is fully functional?
Try asking in D.learn, and to give more infomation.
Bye,
bearophile
On Monday, 17 September 2012 at 01:15:56 UTC, ixid wrote:
Is there any use for the way C-style modulus interacts with
negative numbers? It seems little more than broken on the basis
of making positive number modulus operations efficient back
when C was created.
This is not a group for
On Sunday, 9 September 2012 at 19:59:02 UTC, Namespace wrote:
BTW dmd doesn't produce any warning for unused variable.
And this will never change. ;)
Who knows, maybe eventually I'll be able to convince GDC
maintainers to introduce this warning :-)
Zhenya wrote:
...
I suggest to minimize your code, and then show this problem again
in the D.learn newsgroup.
Bye,
bearophile
Namespace:
Vector2D is my own class. If i compare vs2 with vs it works fine,
but if i compare vs or vs2 with vf, the cast fail and i get a
null-reference. How can i avoid this?
I suggest to ask such questions in D.learn.
Bye,
bearophile
on this topic:
http://prog21.dadgum.com/116.html
Bye,
bearophile
problems.
I have done some searching, but I have not found this presentation.
Bye,
bearophile
Sorry, wrong place. I'll try again elsewhere.
are implemented on their surface (it doesn't
explain how array append is managed at runtime).
Bye,
bearophile
++ programmers.
Do you know/have use cases for running D code (with current or near-future CTFE
limitations) at run-time?
Bye,
bearophile
Please ignore this post, the web interface is now more buggy than it used to be.
Sorry,
bearophile
, I suggest you the D.learn newsgroup.
Bye,
bearophile
; }
override int fun2() { return 1; }
override auto fun3() { return 1; }
}
void main() {}
Bye,
bearophile
Steven Schveighoffer:
so even though I feel this is a bug (it should be silently ignored),
Generally silently ignoring attributes is exactly the opposite you want from a
modern compiler. See bug
3934.
Bye,
bearophile
,
bearophile
tries and failed. The number was %s, chosen);
din.getc(); // useless?
}
Bye,
bearophile
Please ignore this post, my error, I am sorry. I'll post it elsewhere again.
.
Bye,
bearophile
,
bearophile
22 matches
Mail list logo
