[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2023-05-18 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment #9 from RazvanN --- ***

[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2013-07-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2013-07-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2013-07-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 --- Comment #6 from Henning Pohl henn...@still-hidden.de 2013-07-02 13:04:46 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #1) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2270 I think a decision should be taken. What do

[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2013-07-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-07-02 14:00:23 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Can only three people actually take decisions like that? I'd like Walter and/or Andrei to give a comment to this (and to your patch). I have

[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2013-06-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-06-30 17:07:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2270 I think a decision should be taken. What do you think about this issue Henning Pohl? --

[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2013-06-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-06-29 01:24:25 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Thank you for the comments Kenji. 1. Default argument is not so often used. Then, reduction amount of the code is very limited. I agree.

[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2013-06-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 Henning Pohl henn...@still-hidden.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 10491] Type inference for function arguments with default value

2013-06-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10491 --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-06-28 21:13:50 PDT --- I don't like the enhancements of this kind. Because: 1. Default argument is not so often used. Then, reduction amount of the code is very limited. 2. It breaks