[Issue 10552] Cannot apply access specifiers to individual anonymous enum members

2016-08-27 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 10552] Cannot apply access specifiers to individual anonymous enum members

2014-06-02 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 --- Comment #6 from Walter Bright --- I don't see much value in this enhancement. --

[Issue 10552] Cannot apply access specifiers to individual anonymous enum members

2013-07-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Sev

[Issue 10552] Cannot apply access specifiers to individual anonymous enum members

2013-07-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright 2013-07-09 12:20:51 PDT --- Language changes are enhancements, not bug fixes. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: -

[Issue 10552] Cannot apply access specifiers to individual anonymous enum members

2013-07-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-07-06 07:08:29 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > - > > enum > > { > > private A = 1, > > B = 2, > > } > > - > > > > $ dmd test.d > > > Error: basic type e

[Issue 10552] Cannot apply access specifiers to individual anonymous enum members

2013-07-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 --- Comment #3 from Henning Pohl 2013-07-06 05:17:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I cannot see any benefits there. > You can just separate public anonymous enum and private one. > > private enum > { > A = 1, > } > enum > { > B

[Issue 10552] Cannot apply access specifiers to individual anonymous enum members

2013-07-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-07-06 00:47:36 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > - > enum > { > private A = 1, > B = 2, > } > - > > $ dmd test.d > > Error: basic type expected, not private I cannot see any benefits there

[Issue 10552] Cannot apply access specifiers to individual anonymous enum members

2013-07-05 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 Henning Pohl changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|