[Issue 11258] Static field access problem

2013-10-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11258 --- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-10-14 15:05:50 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I hope you that. > And I'd ask you one question: If the lambda has quite big body, how it will be > output? OK, I have opened Issue 11263 . --

[Issue 11258] Static field access problem

2013-10-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11258 --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-14 10:11:39 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Regarding the extra newlines in the error message: > > > test.d(5): Error: static assert (__traits(compiles, () > > { > > auto x = Foo.spam; > > } > >

[Issue 11258] Static field access problem

2013-10-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11258 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-10-14 09:42:37 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Sorry, this is NOT a regression. Current behavior is intended. Thank you Kenji, this was tricky for me. Regarding the extra newlines in the er

[Issue 11258] Static field access problem

2013-10-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11258 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11258] Static field access problem

2013-10-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11258 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-10-14 06:45:10 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > In dmd 2.063 this used to work. This is a regression from 2.062, and same error occurs with 2.063. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/u