https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11287
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
--
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11287
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11287
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11287
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-10-17 06:48:36 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Question:
Doesn't this mean that the compiler *must* implement NRVO? I thought NRVO was
an optimization *opportunity*?
If
//
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11287
Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11287
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-10-17 09:08:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
Unfortunately current D language spec does not mention about NRVO, so It's
still one of the optimizations.
