[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-24 23:50:29 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #11 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-10-24 23:51:29 PDT --- Commit pushed to 2.064 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #8 from safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 05:52:16 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1280) This hack makes the program run properly for me I don't know if there are cases where this will produce invalid code,

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull ---

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #7 from safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com 2013-10-22 22:25:39 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1279) Edb screenshot for unoptimized version Just to make it more clear what the issue is (I was quite sick when I wrote the

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #2 from safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com 2013-10-21 00:03:26 PDT --- That is the assembly without printf's, btw. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #4 from safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com 2013-10-21 12:13:49 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1274) Edb screenshot for assert test -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #3 from safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com 2013-10-21 12:13:18 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1273) Edb screenshot for second printf -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #5 from safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com 2013-10-21 12:20:33 PDT --- As you can see in the first screen shot, the address for s41 is calculated properly, whereas in the second screenshot the is a mistake. rip for the

[Issue 11310] Alignment failure in test42.d

2013-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310 --- Comment #6 from safety0ff.bugz safety0ff.b...@gmail.com 2013-10-21 12:59:27 PDT --- Looking at the non-optimized version of the code, the test instruction operates on dwords, which makes the constant 3 bytes longer (i.e. the difference