https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488
berni44 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@d-ecke.de
Component|dlang.org
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FORTRAN "FORI=" Error |Disallow chaining of -
|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488
--- Comment #4 from Manfred Nowak ---
(In reply to Stewart Gordon from comment #3)
> But how would such an expression find its way into real-world code in the
> first place?
I did show by example, that chaining "-" and "--" is not tolerable. An anal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488
--- Comment #5 from Stewart Gordon ---
(In reply to Manfred Nowak from comment #4)
> I did show by example, that chaining "-" and "--" is not tolerable. An
> analog example holds for "+" and "++". Its the burdon of the language
> designer to give the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--- Comment #6 from Iai
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488
--- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #6)
> It looks like the grammar does allow this, but fails semantic because in the
> following expression, -x is not an lvalue (probably an implementation detail
> though).
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
--
