https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #13 from Walter Bright ---
(In reply to Manu from comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3189
> >
> > I honestly don't think that my two pull requests will make it in time for
> >
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #14 from Manu ---
Thanks walter!
Rainer: Is it possible to make VisualD manage this build flag appropriately
according to the version of VisualStudio (or perhaps, which debug engine) the
user is running?
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #15 from Rainer Schuetze ---
The "debug info" selector has "Symbolic (suitable for Mago)" and "Symbolic
(suitable for VS debug engine)". It could be derived from the selected debug
engine, it already does that when determining whether to
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
Rainer Schuetze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #1
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #2 from Manu 2014-01-11 01:22:48 PST ---
Well I think he needs to come up with something if not that, because it can't
go on not being able to inspect classes.
Do you know any workarounds?
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.purem
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Co
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Schuetze 2014-01-11 01:55:01
PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well I think he needs to come up with something if not that, because it can't
> go on not being able to inspect classes.
> Do you know any workarounds
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #5 from Manu 2014-01-17 04:51:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> One point in Walter's favor is that VS2012 contains two debug engines, one
> that
> works with '.', but fails to display other things locals in watches. The othe
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #6 from Manu 2014-01-21 17:16:10 PST ---
Walter: can you please chime in on this one?
It's a massive hole in the windows debugging experience, and it would be
super-awesome if a fix can get in on DMD 2.065...
I have a lot of clas
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #8 from Manu 2014-01-22 01:44:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I do agree that we're forced to live with any bugs in VS. Even if Microsoft
> fixes them, those fixes often don't wind up on users' machines.
>
> If @ is the onl
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
Benjamin Thaut changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@benjamin-thaut.de
--- Comment
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #10 from Manu 2014-02-19 05:51:05 PST ---
Is a solution for this going to make it into 2.065?
This is the biggest problem with debugging DMD code at the moment.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cg
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #11 from Benjamin Thaut 2014-02-19
09:19:50 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3189
I honestly don't think that my two pull requests will make it in time for
2.065, especially as 2.065 is already in the r
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
--- Comment #12 from Manu 2014-02-19 09:28:54 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3189
>
> I honestly don't think that my two pull requests will make it in time for
> 2.065, especially as 2.
16 matches
Mail list logo
