[Issue 12873] Valgrind unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W prefix on x87 load)

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|D1 & D2 |D2 --

[Issue 12873] Valgrind unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W prefix on x87 load)

2014-06-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #4 from yebblies --- Is this really wrong-code? I'd say it's just a workaround for a valgrind bug, and a minor code-size optimization. --

[Issue 12873] Valgrind unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W prefix on x87 load)

2014-06-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Issue 12873] Valgrind unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W prefix on x87 load)

2014-06-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W prefix on x87 load) --

[Issue 12873] Valgrind unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W prefix on x87 load)

2014-06-06 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W prefix on x87 load) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/a44b7b8bc3ff041eb9e524adc242d64672a0c42c Merge pull request #3634 from yebblies/issue12873 Issue 12873 - Valgrind unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W

[Issue 12873] Valgrind unhandled instruction bytes 0x48 0xDB (redundant REX_W prefix on x87 load)

2014-06-06 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from yebblies --- https://gi