[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4 --

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||spec --

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 --- Comment #35 from Jonathan M Davis issues.dl...@jmdavisprog.com --- (In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #34) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4349 The discussion was inconclusive? The change was reverted, though I

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 --- Comment #32 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com --- Automated migration from keyword syntax to attribute syntax can be done by dfix. Then attribute syntax can be enforced if needed. --

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 --- Comment #33 from Jonathan M Davis issues.dl...@jmdavisprog.com --- (In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #32) Automated migration from keyword syntax to attribute syntax can be done by dfix. Then attribute syntax can be enforced if

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 Nick Treleaven ntrel-...@mybtinternet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 --- Comment #30 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org --- wow. so i was right. let's see how long it took for my other suggestions to become blessed. --

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 sinkuup...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 --- Comment #27 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- (In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #14) I really think that we've passed the point where it's worth fixing it. NO This attitude is the biggest problem D has. Please, watch Scott

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- (In reply to Don from comment #27) (In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #14) I really think that we've passed the point where it's worth fixing it. NO This attitude is the

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|accept '@' before |accept '@' before

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1400|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 --- Comment #25 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org --- Created attachment 1402 -- https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1402action=edit testcase; must compile --

[Issue 13388] accept '@' before 'nothrow' and 'pure'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388 --- Comment #26 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org --- Created attachment 1403 -- https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1403action=edit testcase; must fail with 'mustf.foo' is not nothrow and function 'mustf.bar' is nothrow yet may throw