https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1394|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #3 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
Created attachment 1396
-- https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1396action=edit
this must compile
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
Created attachment 1397
-- https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1397action=edit
this must fail 3 times with cannot use 'new' in @nogc
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #5 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
(In reply to bearophile_hugs from comment #1)
Contextual keywords as in C++? :-)
why not? ;-)
it works, it looks nice, it doesn't breaking any existing code. and it looks
much cleaner
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #5)
(In reply to bearophile_hugs from comment #1)
Contextual keywords as in C++? :-)
why not? ;-)
Because it introduces complexity and the return of
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #7 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
(In reply to bearophile_hugs from comment #6)
Because it introduces complexity and the return of investment is minimal.
i don't think that making language slightly more human-friendly is
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #7)
i don't think that making language slightly more human-friendly is
why should i remember when i must put that '@' before attribute?
Adding contextual
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #9 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
(In reply to bearophile_hugs from comment #8)
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #7)
Adding contextual keywords to D is an increase in complexity for users too.
aren't existing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #10 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #2)
Created attachment 1395 [details]
postfix function attributes w/o '@' (better code, allows nogc {} and nogc:)
Combination of prefix attribute and
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
--- Comment #11 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #10)
Combination of prefix attribute and contextual keyword feature will cause
ambiguity.
I think just only postfix cases should be accepted.
and my
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1395|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1398|0 |1
is obsolete|
14 matches
Mail list logo