https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13451
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--- Comment #
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13451
--- Comment #2 from briancsch...@gmail.com ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/blob/master/test/runnable/funclit.d#L258
I would not be surprised if it started off as an oversight and was then added
to the test suite.
We should never br
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13451
Jakob Ovrum changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakobov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Jakob
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13451
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara ---
(In reply to briancschott from comment #0)
> ---
> fp = function int(int a) => a;
> ---
When I cleaned up parser code for lambdas, the syntax was intentional as that
is a combination of:
- the keyword "function"
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13451
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara ---
https:
- Lambda syntax with explicit return type not documented
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/d4c0a53c2b123e46bfc9dba2ec75b608f6f44769
Merge pull request #656 from 9rnsr/fix13451
Issue 13451 - Lambda syntax with explicit return type not documented
--
