https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
--- Comment #16 from Walter Bright ---
Some progress:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10343
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 & D2 |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
ncras...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ncras...@gmail.com
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
--- Comment #15 from Don 2012-01-24 06:21:47 PST ---
An important thing to realize about this bug is that it is *not* the primary
cause of slow performance and high memory consumption in CTFE.
Fixing this bug would make very little difference,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
--- Comment #14 from Leandro Lucarella
2012-01-24 02:37:46 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I tried it by building the library and running its unittests, and running the
> test suite. It was considerably slower.
>
> The GC used was the old
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
--- Comment #13 from Walter Bright 2012-01-24
02:29:36 PST ---
I tried it by building the library and running its unittests, and running the
test suite. It was considerably slower.
The GC used was the old C++ version of the D runtime GC.
You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
--- Comment #12 from Leandro Lucarella
2012-01-24 02:19:04 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I made an experimental build of dmd that uses a gc. The compiler slowed down
> quite a bit.
In which cases did you tried it? For files that allocat
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
--- Comment #11 from Walter Bright 2012-01-23
11:23:06 PST ---
I made an experimental build of dmd that uses a gc. The compiler slowed down
quite a bit.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Yo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
Leandro Lucarella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leandro.lucarella@sociomant
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|2.059 |---
--- Comment #9 from Don 2012-01-21 01:26:54
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
Jesse Phillips changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
--- Comment #8 from Don 2011-09-02 00:21:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> It appears that _any_ access of an array variable allocates ram, resulting in
> drastically slower compile times (+55 seconds) and excess memory usage (30+ mb
> in t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
Rob Jacques changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandf...@jhu.edu
--- Comment #7 from Rob
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |critical
--- Comment #5 from Don 2009-08-31
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #4 from Don
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 12:31 ---
We've had some success with reenabling boehm-gc:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc/ticket/49 .
"Another test with USE_BOEHM_GC=0, REDIRECT_MALLOC=GC_malloc and IGNORE_FREE
17 matches
Mail list logo
