https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14363
deadalnix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deadal...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from deadalni
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14363
--- Comment #5 from Shammah Chancellor ---
I'm not sure about that part of SDC. I will investigate and see if deadalnix
has some input here.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14363
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara ---
Maybe SDC inserts a hidden field to access enclosing scope in each derived
classes?
void main() {
uint x = 7;
class A {
int fieldA;
auto foo() { return x; }
}
auto makeB(uint y) {
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14363
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara ---
(In reply to Shammah Chancellor from comment #2)
> Your code has a bug?
>
> return new B(5);
>
> Should be:
>
> return new B();
Yes. Sorry.
> With that, your example compiles and works just fine on SDC.
Hmm, i
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14363
--- Comment #2 from Shammah Chancellor ---
Your code has a bug?
return new B(5);
Should be:
return new B();
With that, your example compiles and works just fine on SDC.
(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #1)
> I'm not sure why SDC accepts th
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14363
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara ---
I'm not sure why SDC accepts the code.
The following reduced case is correctly rejected by dmd, because ba.foo() won't
work expectedly. Maybe SDC generates wrong code?
void main()
{
uint x = 7;
class A
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14363
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
