[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2017-07-19 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #13 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to dmd-cxx at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/5494539c9d6c7b4414f0cabc5b79e9fcf792410b Merge pull request #3276 from schveiguy/fixforwardrange

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-06-05 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-06-05 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
#3276 from schveiguy/fixforwardrange Fix issue 14544 - isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range --

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #11 from Ketmar Dark --- hm. now that's strange. i'll try to find what's going on. i don't have 64 bit system, so didn't know that it works there. --

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #10 from Steven Schveighoffer --- Wow, that typeof(somemember) is very strange. Without Ketmar's latest addition, it failed on 32-bit systems and passed on 64-bit. I think there is likely a bug somewhere, but I'm not very motivated to fin

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #9 from Steven Schveighoffer --- Thanks, done. --

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #8 from Ketmar Dark --- supplemental fix for your PR: diff --git a/std/range/primitives.d b/std/range/primitives.d index 972b709..1e427a4 100644 --- a/std/range/primitives.d +++ b/std/range/primitives.d @@ -908,10 +908,10 @@ template isR

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer --- PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3276 --

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-04 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 Jacob Carlborg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment #5 from Jacob Carlb

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-04 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark --- something should be fixed, i think. either documentation, or `isForwardRange`. and fixing `isForwardRange` will not break anything, as it will happily accept both prop and non-prop `save`... --

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-04 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis --- Oh, it's stupid that save is required to be a property, since it's not at all an abstraction for a variable, but I don't think that Andrei really understands the idea behind properties (certainly, he didn't wh

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-04 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 --- Comment #2 from Ketmar Dark --- wow, it's fun. it specified nowhere in the docs. what i see is "with the save primitive", which clearly not necessary a property. it also contradics my common sense too. with the fix i proposed it doesn't matter if

[Issue 14544] isForwardRange failed to recognise valid forward range

2015-05-04 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14544 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|