https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|dmd |tools
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
greensunn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greensunn...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #3)
> Yes, they are orthogonal. But:
>
> 1. It is potentially higher-impact. Even with per-package compilation, DMD
> will still need to lex/parse/etc. ALL modu
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
Yes, they are orthogonal. But:
1. It is potentially higher-impact. Even with per-package compilation, DMD will
still need to lex/parse/etc. ALL modules.
2. Any improvements we make now to rdmd may be harde
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
--- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #1)
> If we want to improve build times with rdmd, the best thing we can do is get
> rid of rdmd (and only leave it as a thin wrapper around dmd). This is
> beca
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
