[Issue 14804] Comparing two Nullables does not check if either is null

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14804 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added CC|b2.t...@gmx.com | --

[Issue 14804] Comparing two Nullables does not check if either is null

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14804 Jack Stouffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 14804] Comparing two Nullables does not check if either is null

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14804 Luís Marques changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@luismarques.eu --- Comment #4 from Luís

[Issue 14804] Comparing two Nullables does not check if either is null

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14804 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh

[Issue 14804] Comparing two Nullables does not check if either is null

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14804 --- Comment #3 from b2.t...@gmx.com --- (In reply to monkeyworks12 from comment #2) > but let's not close this one for opEquals. Without great convictionI've opened the PR, but let's the official maintainers take the decision ;) https://github.com/D

[Issue 14804] Comparing two Nullables does not check if either is null

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14804 --- Comment #2 from monkeywork...@hotmail.com --- I agree opCmp is a little weird to implement for Nullable, but it's really not much different from NaN. If we follow what the floating point numbers do: Nullable!int n1; Nullable!int n2 = 0; assert(!

[Issue 14804] Comparing two Nullables does not check if either is null

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14804 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com --- Comment #1 from b2.t...