https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14854
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14854
--- Comment #6 from Dlang Bot ---
@Mai-Lapyst created dlang/dmd pull request #15052 "Fix issue 14854 - @disable
this inconsistent between structs and classes" fixing this issue:
- Fix issue 14854 - @disable this inconsistent betwe
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14854
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14854
--- Comment #5 from Dlang Bot ---
dlang/phobos pull request #6893 "Remove redundant body of @disable functions.
Issue 14854 DMD" was merged into master:
- 336047098929c141f2fdd7b00c25d0aec3abedda by Lepadatu Tiberiu:
Remove redundant body of
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14854
--- Comment #4 from Dlang Bot ---
@tibi77 created dlang/phobos pull request #6893 "Remove redundant body of
@disable functions. Issue 14854 DMD" mentioning this issue:
- Remove redundant body of @disable functions. Issue 14854 DMD
created dlang/dmd pull request #9413 "Fix Issue 14854 - @disable this
inconsistent between structs and classes" fixing this issue:
- Fix Issue 14854 - @disable this inconsistent between structs and classes
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9413
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14854
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis ---
My suggestion is to make it an error when @disable is used on a function with a
body - just like happens right now when you do it with @disable this() {} on a
struct. I can't think of any reason why this
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14854
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14854
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||trivial