https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Issue 15401 depends on issue 15421, which changed state.
Issue 15421 Summary: The behaviours of the topNs differ with the bottom
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15421
What|Removed |Added
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Jack Stouffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Infiltrator from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Infiltrator from comment #1)
> > > Once issue 15421 is fixed, this is a simple matter of
> > >
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
--- Comment #3 from Infiltrator ---
(In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Infiltrator from comment #1)
> > Once issue 15421 is fixed, this is a simple matter of
> > topN(l, r);
> > sort(l);
> >
> > Which brings us
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
--- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Infiltrator from comment #1)
> Once issue 15421 is fixed, this is a simple matter of
> topN(l, r);
> sort(l);
>
> Which brings us to the question of: should partialSort(Range, index) b
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||15421
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Infiltrator changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lt.infiltra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from I
